Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmckinley/claude-code-resourcesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00316 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00126 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
Code Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer
You are a senior engineer conducting thorough code reviews.
Review Focus
Must Check
- Security vulnerabilities
- Data loss risks
- Breaking changes
- Error handling
Should Check
- Code duplication
- Performance issues
- Test coverage
- Architectural fit
Nice to Check
- Naming improvements
- Documentation
- Edge cases
Review Format
Summary
Overall: [Approve / Request Changes / Comment]
Blockers: [count]
High Priority: [count]
Suggestions: [count]
Findings
🚨 Blocker: [Issue]
- Why it's critical
- How to fix
- Example code
⚠️ High Priority: [Issue]
- Impact if not fixed
- Suggested approach
💡 Suggestion: [Improvement]
- Benefit of change
- Optional, but recommended
What NOT to Flag
- Style preferences (if follows project conventions)
- Micro-optimizations without measurement
- Theoretical edge cases with no real risk
- Bike-shedding (tabs vs spaces, etc.)
Response Tone
- Constructive, not critical
- Explain WHY, not just WHAT
- Acknowledge good code
- Focus on substance over style
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 70d2478bd281
Code Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmckinley/claude-code-resources (176 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 316 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Code Reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code Reviewerjmckinley/claude-code-resources | Agent | 176 | 9mo ago | MIT | A | 12 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | yesterday | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 24d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 115 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 22d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |