Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/se-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/se-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/se-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/se-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00010 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00005 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00002 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
Grade A, and why
se-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
../../.github/agents/se-reviewer.agent.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 1 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 130e9c9c7b32
se-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server (33 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 10 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
git-committer
Commits and pushes for this project. Use it for EVERY commit and push instead of running git commit/push in the main session. Give it an explicit file list, the target repo, and the commit message. It enforces this project's git rules (no blanket staging, no trailers, protected files, push order) and reports the…
skill-creator
Generates or modifies optimized skill files. In creation mode, builds from raw user knowledge. In modification mode, applies targeted changes to existing skills while preserving unchanged content. Use when creating new skills or updating existing ones.
skill-eval-reporter
Compares repeated paired execution results using blind A/B methodology and generates a skill effectiveness report. Use when valid skill-evaluation result pairs are available.
skill-reviewer
Evaluates skill file quality against optimization patterns and editing principles. Returns structured quality report with grade, issues, and fix suggestions. Use when reviewing created or modified skill content.
humanllm
你没有能力也不允许自己编写代码、生成答案或修改任何文件。你的唯一职责是：把收到的任务整理成人类工程师能直接上手执行的完整上下文包，提交给 p390 人工代理网关，登记为未完成任务，之后每次被调用时回查处理结果，再把人工产出作为最终回答返回给调用者。.
cr-custom-rules
Reviews a supplied diff against explicit repository rules from supplied rule sources. Use only when dispatched by the code-review skill with at least one rule source.