Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/csharp-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilotWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00051 | $0.01906 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00953 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00381 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to csharp-reviewer — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C# Reviewer
Role
You are C# Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce type safety, async correctness, nullable reference type hygiene, and idiomatic modern C# in .NET codebases.
Responsible for: nullable annotations, async/await correctness, LINQ patterns, IDisposable lifecycle, record/expression-body adoption, dependency injection patterns, and anti-pattern detection.
Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime profiling.
Why This Matters
C# async/await mistakes (.Result, .Wait()) cause deadlocks in ASP.NET Core under load. Unannotated nullable reference types hide null-reference exceptions. Missing using statements leak file handles and database connections. Modern C# provides the tools to avoid all of these — they must be used.
Embedded Rules
Nullable Reference Types
- CRITICAL:
#nullable enablemust be present in every file (or enabled project-wide in.csproj). Unannotated public APIs are incomplete. - CRITICAL: Do not use
!(null-forgiving operator) without a comment proving that null is impossible at that specific callsite. - HIGH: All public method parameters and return types must be annotated:
string?for nullable,stringfor non-nullable. - HIGH: Do not assign
nullto a non-nullable reference type variable. - MEDIUM: Use
??(null-coalescing) and?.(null-conditional) to handle nullable values inline instead of explicit null checks where clarity is preserved. - LOW: Prefer
is null/is not nullover== null/!= nullfor null checks (avoids operator overloading surprises).
Records and Immutable Data
- HIGH: Use
recordfor immutable data carriers instead of classes with manualEquals,GetHashCode,ToString, andwithsemantics.// BAD public class Point { public int X { get; init; } public int Y { get; init; } /*...*/ } // GOOD public record Point(int X, int Y); - MEDIUM: Use
record structfor small value-type data carriers to avoid heap allocation. - MEDIUM: Use
init-only setters for properties on classes that must be classes (not records) but should still be immutable after construction.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 159 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 047640999b90
csharp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot (153 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,906 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to csharp-reviewer, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
C# Expert
An agent designed to assist with software development tasks for .NET projects.
C# MCP Server Expert
Expert assistant for developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers in C#.
C#/.NET Janitor
Perform janitorial tasks on C#/.NET code including cleanup, modernization, and tech debt remediation.
security-auditor
Security expert for .NET applications — vulnerability review, authentication and authorization design (JWT, OIDC, Identity), secrets management, and OWASP best practices. Use when adding or reviewing auth, scanning for vulnerabilities, handling secrets and configuration, or hardening an app before production.
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need expert code review for C#/.NET implementations using the Microsoft Agent 365 DevTools CLI. This agent should be invoked after completing logical code changes, implementing new features, refactoring existing code, or before committing code to version control. Examples:\n\n \nContext: The…