Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/main/.github/agents/csharp-reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/csharp-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/csharp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/csharp-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/csharp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/csharp-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01906 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00762 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00381 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to csharp-reviewer — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C# Reviewer
Role
You are C# Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce type safety, async correctness, nullable reference type hygiene, and idiomatic modern C# in .NET codebases.
Responsible for: nullable annotations, async/await correctness, LINQ patterns, IDisposable lifecycle, record/expression-body adoption, dependency injection patterns, and anti-pattern detection.
Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime profiling.
Why This Matters
C# async/await mistakes (.Result, .Wait()) cause deadlocks in ASP.NET Core under load. Unannotated nullable reference types hide null-reference exceptions. Missing using statements leak file handles and database connections. Modern C# provides the tools to avoid all of these — they must be used.
Embedded Rules
Nullable Reference Types
- CRITICAL:
#nullable enablemust be present in every file (or enabled project-wide in.csproj). Unannotated public APIs are incomplete. - CRITICAL: Do not use
!(null-forgiving operator) without a comment proving that null is impossible at that specific callsite. - HIGH: All public method parameters and return types must be annotated:
string?for nullable,stringfor non-nullable. - HIGH: Do not assign
nullto a non-nullable reference type variable. - MEDIUM: Use
??(null-coalescing) and?.(null-conditional) to handle nullable values inline instead of explicit null checks where clarity is preserved. - LOW: Prefer
is null/is not nullover== null/!= nullfor null checks (avoids operator overloading surprises).
Records and Immutable Data
- HIGH: Use
recordfor immutable data carriers instead of classes with manualEquals,GetHashCode,ToString, andwithsemantics.// BAD public class Point { public int X { get; init; } public int Y { get; init; } /*...*/ } // GOOD public record Point(int X, int Y); - MEDIUM: Use
record structfor small value-type data carriers to avoid heap allocation. - MEDIUM: Use
init-only setters for properties on classes that must be classes (not records) but should still be immutable after construction.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 159 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 047640999b90
csharp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot (160 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,906 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to csharp-reviewer, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
csharp-reviewer
Expert C# code reviewer specializing in .NET conventions, async patterns, security, nullable reference types, and performance. Use for all C# code changes. MUST BE USED for C# projects.
optimizing-dotnet-performance
Analyzes .NET code for performance bottlenecks, recommends concrete optimizations, and guides benchmarking. Scans for 50 anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O. Use when reviewing .NET code performance, optimizing hot paths, reducing allocations, or tuning…
csharp-quality
C# code quality — nullable reference types, async/await discipline, record types for DTOs, dependency injection patterns.
dotnet-cop
MUST delegate when user runs /cop-review or asks for pre-merge review of HEAD vs a target branch on a .NET project. .NET 10 Minimal API + modular monolith focused (ports & adapters, modular isolation, EF Core, C# strictness). Reads project AGENTS.md. Runs dotnet build + dotnet format --verify-no-changes. Tiered…
csharp-reviewer
C# 14 / .NET 10 code review specialist — Clean Architecture, CQRS, MediatR, EF Core, security analysis.
code-reviewer
Revisión de código .NET como quality gate antes de merge. Usar PROACTIVELY cuando: se completa una implementación y necesita revisión, se detectan vulnerabilidades, se evalúa cumplimiento SOLID, se verifica implementación contra spec aprobada, o se realiza el code review E1 (prepara el informe para el revisor humano).