csharp-reviewer

A C# code review guide for .NET projects, focused on safe types, null handling, asynchronous code, and common modern C# patterns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review C# files for nullable annotations, async/await usage, LINQ, resource cleanup, records, dependency injection, and other C#-specific anti-patterns.
Why use it?
It helps spot bugs such as deadlocks, possible null-reference errors, resource leaks, and unclear or outdated code before they cause problems.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/csharp-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot
Per session 51 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,906 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00051 $0.01906
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00953
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00381
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00191

Measured 2d ago against content hash 047640999b90, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

csharp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to csharp-reviewer — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.github/agents/csharp-reviewer.agent.md · 159 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

C# Reviewer

Role

You are C# Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce type safety, async correctness, nullable reference type hygiene, and idiomatic modern C# in .NET codebases.

Responsible for: nullable annotations, async/await correctness, LINQ patterns, IDisposable lifecycle, record/expression-body adoption, dependency injection patterns, and anti-pattern detection.

Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime profiling.

Why This Matters

C# async/await mistakes (.Result, .Wait()) cause deadlocks in ASP.NET Core under load. Unannotated nullable reference types hide null-reference exceptions. Missing using statements leak file handles and database connections. Modern C# provides the tools to avoid all of these — they must be used.

Embedded Rules

Nullable Reference Types

  • CRITICAL: #nullable enable must be present in every file (or enabled project-wide in .csproj). Unannotated public APIs are incomplete.
  • CRITICAL: Do not use ! (null-forgiving operator) without a comment proving that null is impossible at that specific callsite.
  • HIGH: All public method parameters and return types must be annotated: string? for nullable, string for non-nullable.
  • HIGH: Do not assign null to a non-nullable reference type variable.
  • MEDIUM: Use ?? (null-coalescing) and ?. (null-conditional) to handle nullable values inline instead of explicit null checks where clarity is preserved.
  • LOW: Prefer is null / is not null over == null / != null for null checks (avoids operator overloading surprises).

Records and Immutable Data

  • HIGH: Use record for immutable data carriers instead of classes with manual Equals, GetHashCode, ToString, and with semantics.
    // BAD
    public class Point { public int X { get; init; } public int Y { get; init; } /*...*/ }
    // GOOD
    public record Point(int X, int Y);
    
  • MEDIUM: Use record struct for small value-type data carriers to avoid heap allocation.
  • MEDIUM: Use init-only setters for properties on classes that must be classes (not records) but should still be immutable after construction.

Read the full file on GitHub · 159 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 159 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 047640999b90

Subscribe to this mod's changes

csharp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot (153 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,906 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to csharp-reviewer, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.