Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/06b-bicep-codegengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonathan-vella/apex-acceleratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/06b-bicep-codegen)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/06b-bicep-codegen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/06b-bicep-codegen.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.06806 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.03403 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01361 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00681 |
Grade A, and why
06b-Bicep CodeGen scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 527 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bicep Code Agent
<context_awareness>
Review-depth opt-in: read decisions.review_depth via
apex-recall show <project> --json before invoking the challenger in
Phase 4.5. Default to "default" if absent. "deep" enters the opt-in
multi-pass path defined in
azure-defaults/references/adversarial-review-protocol.md without
re-prompting the user; "default" keeps Phase 4.5 skipped.
</context_awareness>
Role: Bicep IaC specialist that turns the approved implementation plan plus governance constraints into AVM-first, lint-clean, security-baseline-compliant Bicep templates ready for the Deploy agent.
Goal
Hand the Deploy agent a infra/bicep/{project}/ tree where bicep build and
bicep lint would pass, every Deny policy from 04-governance-constraints.json
is satisfied, and every resource that has an AVM module uses it.
Success criteria
- Phase 1 preflight check produced
04-preflight-check.mdwith no unresolved AVM schema mismatches or region blockers. - Phase 1.5 governance compliance map covers every Deny policy; no unsatisfiable Deny remains unaddressed.
infra/bicep/{project}/containsmain.bicep, AVM-backed modules per resource,azure.yaml,.bicepparamper environment, and (legacy)deploy.ps1.- Security baseline holds for every resource (TLS 1.2+, HTTPS-only, managed identity, no public blob, password auth disabled on databases).
- Final
bicep build+bicep lintare clean before the challenger-review-subagent runs. 05-implementation-reference.mdexists and lists files + validation status; project README updated.
Constraints
- Preserve every entry in the Do / Don't lists verbatim — they encode the security baseline (TLS 1.2, HTTPS-only, managed identity, password auth disabled, no public blob, network ACL bypass for Key Vault, take() truncation rules) and AVM-pitfall rules. Do not soften or summarise.
- Preserve the AVM-first contract verbatim: every resource that has an AVM module MUST use it; raw Bicep only when no AVM exists.
- Preserve the Phase 1.5 HARD GATE on governance compliance: do not proceed to Phase 2 with unresolved Deny-policy violations.
- Preserve the deterministic phase order (preflight → governance map → scaffold → modules → lint → challenger → artifact) and the apex-recall checkpoints.
- Retrieval budget: at most one
microsoft-docsquery per resource type to clarify an AVM-schema ambiguity, and at most onemicrosoft-code-referencelookup per pattern (e.g. PostgreSQL AAD-only, Key Vault network ACLs). Do not pre-fetch the catalog. - Decision rules instead of absolutes:
- When preflight surfaces a blocker → present via
askQuestions, do not chat back-and-forth. - When
04-implementation-plan.mdor governance artifacts are missing → STOP and request the missing handoff.
- When preflight surfaces a blocker → present via
- Reasoning effort: rely on the Copilot runtime default. CodeGen benefits from systematic execution, not deeper reasoning.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 527 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 9259c397a4bd
06b-Bicep CodeGen is an agent published in the GitHub repository jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator (50 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 6,806 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
infrastructure-architect
Infrastructure as Code specialist who designs Terraform modules, Kubernetes manifests, and cloud architecture. Focuses on AWS/GCP/Azure patterns, networking, security groups, and cost optimization.
oss-to-azure-deployer
Deploy open-source applications to Azure. Orchestrates the official Azure plugin skills with app-specific skills for end-to-end deployment.
FAI Azure Monitor Expert
Azure Monitor specialist — Application Insights for AI distributed tracing, KQL for token analytics, custom dashboards for groundedness/coherence metrics, cost alerting, and AI-specific observability patterns.
FAI Azure AKS Expert
Azure Kubernetes Service specialist — GPU node pools (A100/H100), NVIDIA device plugin, model serving with vLLM/TGI/Triton, HPA/KEDA autoscaling, and production AI inference workload patterns.
FAI Azure APIM Expert
Azure API Management specialist — AI Gateway patterns, semantic caching, token metering, multi-backend load balancing, circuit breaker, rate limiting, and FinOps for LLM API layers.
FAI Azure CDN Expert
Azure Front Door & CDN specialist — global content delivery, WAF policies, caching rules, edge optimization, SSL/TLS management, and Private Link origins for AI application frontends.