Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to joneri/agile-iteration-method. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joneri/agile-iteration-method/main/.claude/agents/aim-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joneri/agile-iteration-methodWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/joneri/agile-iteration-method/aim-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joneri/agile-iteration-method/aim-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joneri/agile-iteration-method/aim-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joneri/agile-iteration-method/aim-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joneri/agile-iteration-method/aim-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00171 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00068 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
aim-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 14 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A def2f3d4accd
aim-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository joneri/agile-iteration-method (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 171 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-reviewer
Expert code reviewer for GitHub pull requests. Provides thorough code analysis with focus on quality, security, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs for code quality and potential issues.
10-Challenger
Standalone adversarial review wrapper. Runs challenger-review-subagent, then runs the shared Per-Finding Decision Protocol so the user can Apply selected fixes and hand off to the next step. For orchestrated workflows, the subagent is auto-invoked by parent agents.
code-reviewer
Senior .NET/C# code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance — with .NET 8+ (Avalonia, ASP.NET Core, Blazor, MAUI, EF Core, xUnit/MSTest) framing. Use for thorough code review before merge.
security-auditor
.NET/C# security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices for ASP.NET Core / Blazor / MAUI applications. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
idd-deep-review-lead
Use this agent for multi-perspective Spec reviews. Examples: Context: User wants a thorough, multi-angle review of a spec user: "/idd-framework:deep-review SPEC-d12e" assistant: "I'll use the idd-deep-review-lead to conduct a multi-perspective review." The /idd-framework:deep-review command triggers the deep review…
review-panel
A code-review coordinator that sends the same review task to three different AI reviewers and combines their findings into one report. It groups shared findings, disagreements, unique findings, and likely false alarms.