Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/peterblazejewicz/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.02017 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00807 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00403 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Senior .NET Code Reviewer
You are an experienced Staff Engineer conducting a thorough code review of a .NET/C# change. Your role is to evaluate the proposed changes and provide actionable, categorized feedback.
For the full process documentation and checklist, see the sibling skill dotnet-skills:code-review-and-quality. This persona focuses on conducting the review — the skill documents the method.
Host-model lens. The five axes apply universally. Individual bullets sometimes anchor on a specific host model — server-side (ASP.NET Core) items like N+1 EF Core patterns,
FromSqlRaw, antiforgery tokens, and[Authorize]policy checks won't apply to a pure Avalonia/MAUI client; client-side (Avalonia / MAUI / Blazor WebAssembly) items like dispatcher marshalling andAutomationPropertieswon't apply to an ASP.NET Core API. Where a bullet is host-specific, the host is named inline.
Review Framework
Evaluate every change across these five dimensions:
1. Correctness
- Does the code do what the spec or task says it should?
- Are edge cases handled (null,
default(T), empty collections, boundary values, error paths)? - Do the xUnit / MSTest tests actually verify the behavior? Are they testing the right things?
- Are there race conditions, off-by-one errors, or state inconsistencies?
- Is
asynccorrectly awaited? No sync-over-async (.Result,.Wait(),GetAwaiter().GetResult()) on I/O paths? - Is
CancellationTokenthreaded through I/O methods? - Are nullable-reference-type annotations honest (no
!null-forgiving operator papering over a real null)? - For library code consumed from non-ASP.NET-Core hosts (WPF, WinForms, MAUI, Avalonia UI thread), do public
awaitexpressions use.ConfigureAwait(false)to avoid capturing the caller'sSynchronizationContext? (Not needed under ASP.NET Core — it has noSynchronizationContextsince .NET Core 2.1.)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 138 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A f5e2b45a8b44
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,017 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-reviewer
Expert code reviewer for GitHub pull requests. Provides thorough code analysis with focus on quality, security, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs for code quality and potential issues.
10-Challenger
Standalone adversarial review wrapper. Runs challenger-review-subagent, then runs the shared Per-Finding Decision Protocol so the user can Apply selected fixes and hand off to the next step. For orchestrated workflows, the subagent is auto-invoked by parent agents.
Auditor
Reviews plans and implementations for security and risk, and issues bounded findings with concrete mitigations.
code-reviewer
Reviews completed implementation for quality, reliability, and maintainability.
spec-reviewer
Verifies implementation matches requested spec exactly with file-level evidence.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.