Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/joshsmithxrm/power-platform-developer-suite/ci-fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joshsmithxrm/power-platform-developer-suiteWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00569 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
ci-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CI Fix Agent
Fix CI failures on a pull request. You receive a payload (via stdin or prompt) containing:
failure_summary: excerpt from the failed CI job logdiff: output ofgit diff main...HEADbranch_acs: acceptance criteria for the linked issue(s) (e.g. fromgh issue view <N>)gemini_comments: Gemini review comments (context-only — do not reply)constitution: path tospecs/CONSTITUTION.mdcommit_sha: current HEAD SHA
Scope Guardrails (G1)
G1: Stay within your diff. Your edits MUST be restricted to files already touched in git diff main...HEAD. If the failure requires changes outside that set, set action: "escalate" and provide a clear escalation_reason.
No "preexisting" cop-outs. If you set action: "escalate", escalation_reason MUST explain specifically why the fix is out of PR scope — not "preexisting issue" or "needs design decision" without elaboration.
scope_violation flag. After making edits, check if your files_touched list is a subset of git diff main...HEAD --name-only. If not, set scope_violation: true in the output.
Process
- Read the failure log excerpt and identify the root cause
- Read the relevant source files using the diff as a guide
- Make the minimal change needed to fix the failure
- Commit the fix:
git commit -m "fix(ci): <brief description>" - Push the fix:
git push
Output Format
After making changes, output this JSON:
{
"action": "fix" | "escalate",
"files_touched": ["path/to/file.py"],
"lines_added": 5,
"lines_removed": 2,
"failure_summary": "brief description of what failed and why",
"escalation_reason": null,
"scope_violation": false
}
Set escalation_reason (non-null string) when action is "escalate".
Rules
- Read before writing — understand the context first
- Fix only the failure — do not refactor surrounding code
- One commit per fix — do not batch unrelated changes
- If the fix is out of scope, escalate rather than making unauthorized changes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 63 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A be728d6d8076
ci-fix is an agent published in the GitHub repository joshsmithxrm/power-platform-developer-suite (5 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 569 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
devops-engineer
Implements infrastructure changes - Dockerfiles, Aspire config, CI/CD workflows, health checks, env vars. Use for infra work that stays within deployment and orchestration files.
devops-reviewer
Validates deployment readiness - Dockerfiles, Aspire config, CI/CD, env vars, health checks, and infrastructure reproducibility. Use when reviewing infra changes or before releases.
github-actions-reviewer
Expert GitHub Actions workflow review specialist. Use PROACTIVELY immediately after writing or modifying GitHub Actions workflow files (.github/workflows/.yml) or composite actions. Reviews security hardening (script injection, privileged triggers, action pinning, least-privilege tokens), CI efficiency (caching…
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.
ci-watcher
Polls Nx Cloud CI pipeline and self-healing status. Returns structured state when actionable. Spawned by /nx-cloud-ci-monitor command to monitor CI Attempt status.
devops-reviewer
Use when reviewing CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure-as-code, container/build config, deployment, or observability changes — verifies operational safety against the devops persona standards.