Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/josstei/maestro-orchestrateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/mlops_engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/mlops_engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/mlops_engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/mlops_engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/mlops_engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.00205 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00082 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
mlops_engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent methodology loaded via MCP tool get_agent. Call get_agent(agents: ["mlops-engineer"]) to read the full methodology at delegation time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 3db488b3827d
mlops_engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository josstei/maestro-orchestrate (485 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 205 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
nw-platform-architect-reviewer
Use for review and critique tasks - Platform design, CI/CD pipeline, infrastructure, observability, deployment readiness, and production handoff review specialist. Runs on Haiku for cost efficiency.
ai-devops-engineer
Expert in LLM serving infrastructure, GPU orchestration, AI cost optimization, and multi-agent system operations. Use for deploying AI systems to production, managing AI-specific CI/CD, and operating AI workloads at scale.
dbt-deployer
Deploys local dbt projects to dbt Projects on Snowflake and manages CI/CD pipelines.
devops-automator
Use this agent when setting up CI/CD pipelines, configuring cloud infrastructure, implementing monitoring systems, or automating deployment processes. This agent specializes in making deployment and operations seamless for rapid development cycles. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Setting up automated deployments\nuser: "We…
critic-security
Review code for OWASP-style security issues (injection, authn/authz, secrets, supply chain, LLM-specific) in parallel with other critics during /vdd-multi. For full audits producing a formal docs/audit/ report, use security-auditor instead.
architecture-reviewer
Review docs/ARCHITECTURE.md for Data Model correctness, Security (OWASP), Scalability, and YAGNI. Spawn after architect to gate the Architecture→Planning boundary.