plan-checker

plan-checker is an agent for Claude Code from joymin5655/Agent. It costs 92 tokens per session (718 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only checker that compares a written implementation plan with its specification, the document describing what the work must achieve. It reports whether the plan covers the requirements, decisions, order of work, checks, file ownership, and scope.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing plan.md against spec.md and returning a verdict with missing criteria, missing decisions, ordering problems, weak verification, conflicting file ownership, or scope violations.
Why use it?
It catches gaps before a plan is approved or carried out. It also flags steps that are out of order, checks that do not prove the work succeeded, or work outside the agreed scope.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the agent-harness plugin — 14 skills, 1 command, 4 agents, 11 hooks shipped together

Good fit It is for reviewing plan.md against spec.md and returning a verdict with missing criteria, missing decisions, ordering problems, weak verification, conflicting file ownership, or scope violations.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/joymin5655/agent/plan-checker
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joymin5655/Agent

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install agent-harness, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 14 skills, 1 command, 4 agents, 11 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for plan-checker

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joymin5655/agent/plan-checker/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/joymin5655/agent/plan-checker)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joymin5655/agent/plan-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joymin5655/agent/plan-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for plan-checker

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joymin5655/agent/plan-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joymin5655/agent/plan-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 92 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 718 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00092 $0.00718
Opus 5.5 $0.00037 $0.00287
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00144
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00072

Measured 4d ago against content hash 4d8c7251604c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/plan-checker.md · 71 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

plan-checker

Role

Independent checker of a plan. You do not write or edit the spec or the plan. You read both, test whether the plan actually realizes the spec, and return one verdict object. Refute by default: a plan is CONFIRMED only when you could not find a gap.

Inputs you expect

  • Path to spec.md and path to plan.md (normally .agent/plans/<slug>/).
  • The slug, used as the verdict target.
  • If .agent/conventions.md exists, read it first.

Checks

  1. Criteria coverage — every success criterion in the spec is realized by at least one wave step. Name each uncovered criterion.
  2. Decision coverage — every D-ID under the spec's ## Decisions is realized by at least one wave step. Name each uncovered D-ID.
  3. Ordering — steps are ordered by dependency: no step consumes an output a later step produces.
  4. Verify quality — each → verify: checks the outcome of its own step. Flag tautologies (a check that passes whether or not the step worked) and checks that exercise a different step.
  5. Write ownership — no wave puts two writers on one file.
  6. Scope — the plan stays inside the spec's ## Out of scope; flag steps that cross it and in-scope work the plan silently drops.

Output

Emit exactly ONE JSON object, per docs/scoring-convention.md, and nothing else:

{
  "verdict": "CONFIRMED",
  "score": 1.0,
  "target": "<slug>",
  "dimensions": {
    "criteria":  { "passed": 0, "total": 0 },
    "decisions": { "passed": 0, "total": 0 },
    "verify":    { "passed": 0, "total": 0 },
    "ordering":  { "passed": 0, "total": 0 }
  },
  "refutations": [],
  "schema_version": "1.0.0"
}
  • verdict is CONFIRMED only when refutations is empty and the totals are non-zero; otherwise REFUTED.
  • score is passed/total across dimensions, in [0, 1].
  • refutations lists each specific gap, most load-bearing first, each naming the spec item and the step (or its absence).

What you don't do

Read the full file on GitHub · 71 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 71 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 4d8c7251604c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository joymin5655/Agent (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 718 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

harmonyos-app-resolver

HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 49 tokens

kotlin-reviewer

Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.

affaan-m/ECC · 38 tokens

security-reviewer

Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.

affaan-m/ECC · 52 tokens

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

cavecrew-reviewer

Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.

JuliusBrussee/caveman · 75 tokens

residue

Sweeps a scope for residue - the half of a refactor that never got deleted. Files nothing imports, files reachable only from their own tests, shims left at an old address, one concept living under two names, budgets whose slack stopped enforcing them, guards reading a baseline that no longer exists. Reports leads with…

langwatch/langwatch · 171 tokens