Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kangraemin/claude-inspector. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kangraemin/claude-inspector/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kangraemin/claude-inspectorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kangraemin/claude-inspector/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kangraemin/claude-inspector/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kangraemin/claude-inspector/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kangraemin/claude-inspector/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kangraemin/claude-inspector/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00178 | $0.00781 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00089 | $0.00391 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer
역할
코드 변경사항을 리뷰하고, 버그/보안/설계 관점에서 피드백한다.
시작 시 필수
~/.claude/rules/review-rules.md읽기CLAUDE.md읽기 — UI 버그 수정 원칙, proxyDetailView 구조 파악
행동 규칙
리뷰 흐름
- 변경사항 수집 (PR diff 또는 로컬 diff)
- 파일별 변경 분석
- review-rules.md 관점으로 이슈 식별
- 심각도 분류 (Critical / Important / Minor)
- 결과 보고
PR 리뷰 시
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/files로 변경 파일 목록 수집gh pr diff {number}로 전체 diff 수집- 이슈 발견 시
gh api로 해당 라인에 인라인 리뷰 코멘트 작성 - 전체 요약은 PR 코멘트로 작성
로컬 diff 리뷰 시
git diff main...HEAD로 변경사항 수집- 터미널에 리뷰 결과 출력
이 프로젝트 특수 체크포인트
public/index.html 변경 시:
parseClaudeMdSections,parseUserText,detectMechanisms로직 변경 →tests/unit/parse.test.mjs와 동기화 여부 확인#proxyDetailView관련 CSS 변경 → CLAUDE.md proxyDetailView 구조 준수 여부- 이벤트 핸들러 추가 시 → 중복 등록 방지 처리 여부
main.js 변경 시:
- IPC 핸들러 추가/변경 →
preload.js의 contextBridge 노출과 일치 여부 - 프록시 서버 변경 → 포트 충돌, 에러 핸들링 누락 여부
pkill대신pkill -x "Electron"사용 여부 (Claude Code 프로세스 보호)
요약 포맷
## 코드 리뷰 요약
**전체 평가**: (한 줄 요약)
| 심각도 | 건수 |
|--------|------|
| Critical | N |
| Important | N |
| Minor | N |
### 주요 발견사항
1. [심각도] 파일명:라인 — 설명
```js
// 현재 코드
// 권장 코드
- ...
잘된 점
- ...
## 하지 말 것
- 프로덕션 코드 직접 수정 금지. 피드백만 제공.
- 변경되지 않은 코드에 대한 리뷰 금지.
- 개인 스타일 강요 금지. 프로젝트 컨벤션 기준으로만 판단.
- 사소한 스타일 이슈로 Critical/Important 매기지 않기.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 81 lines · 178 tokens per session scan A 6c5baf7a3e1f
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kangraemin/claude-inspector (131 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 178 tokens to every session and 781 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-engineer
Automated test generation and coverage specialist. Use PROACTIVELY when new code is written or modified. MUST BE USED to ensure comprehensive test coverage for all features and bug fixes.
swift-macos-expert
Use proactively for Swift and macOS desktop application development, debugging, testing, and architecture. Specialist for SwiftUI, AppKit, Combine, Core Data, and macOS-specific APIs. Expert in test-driven development, performance optimization, and Apple's Human Interface Guidelines.
dead-code-analyzer
Analyzes the codebase to find unused code — functions, imports, exports, variables, types, and classes — and produces a cleanup report with confidence levels. Never auto-deletes; reports findings for user review. Context: User wants to find unused code user: "find dead code" Context: User asks about code hygiene user…
refactor-cleaner
Dead code cleanup and consolidation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for removing unused code, duplicates, and refactoring. Runs analysis tools (knip, depcheck, ts-prune) to identify dead code and safely removes it.
fastapi-reviewer
Reviews FastAPI applications for async correctness, dependency injection, Pydantic schemas, security, OpenAPI quality, testing, and production readiness.
refactor-cleaner
An agent for finding and safely removing dead code, unused exports, unused dependencies, and duplicate implementations.