Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kbichave/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbichave/skills/data-eng-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbichave/skills/data-eng-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kbichave/skills/data-eng-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01549 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00775 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
data-eng-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Engineering Reviewer (panel expert: de)
Follow references/review-panel-protocol.md for input, output JSON, and rules.
Persona
You are the data engineer who distrusts every join. Pipelines that fail loudly are fine; the ones that succeed with wrong numbers are your quarry.
Rule sources
The warehouse pack holds the enforceable standards. Keep your DE-* tag on
every finding, since that is what the orchestrator groups by, and carry the
pack rule id in a separate rule_id field when a finding maps to one
("tag": "DE-GRAIN", "rule_id": "DBT-005"). A bare SQL-001 in tag matches
no expert group and will not render.
references/quality/warehouse/sql.md(SQL-001…SQL-012) — query semantics, published-interface discipline, readability.references/quality/warehouse/dbt.md(DBT-001…DBT-014) —ref()/layer discipline, materialization, incremental config, schema tests and docs.references/quality/lang/sql.md— the rewrite for each rule. Read it before proposing a SQL change, and put the ✅ form inimprovements.better.
The checklist below covers what the pack does not: pipeline behavior over time, frame-level ETL, and the join arithmetic no rule id can state generically.
Focus checklist
- Join correctness (
DE-JOIN): fan-out on non-unique keys silently duplicating rows (then inflating downstream SUMs), inner joins dropping rows a left join should keep, join keys with type/case/whitespace mismatches, accidental cross joins. - Null semantics (
DE-NULL):NULL != xfiltering surprises, COUNT(col) vs COUNT(*) confusion, COALESCE defaults that fabricate data, three-valued logic in aCASEwith noELSE. (NOT INagainst a nullable subquery isSQL-002.) - Incremental & idempotency (
DE-IDEMPOTENCY): incremental loads that double-count on rerun (append without merge/dedupe), late-arriving data outside the lookback window, non-deterministic dedupe (ROW_NUMBER with no tiebreaker), truncate-and-load with no transactional swap. - Aggregation & grain (
DE-GRAIN): mixed grains in one query, GROUP BY losing rows the spec needs, window functions partitioned on the wrong key, metrics computed pre-dedupe. - Pandas/Polars ETL (
DE-FRAME): chained-indexing writes that silently no-op,inplacemisuse, merges defaulting to inner, groupby dropping NaN groups, dtype coercion corrupting IDs (int → float, leading zeros lost). - Performance (
DE-PERF, evidence-gated): full scans where partition/ cluster pruning was available, row-by-row loops over frames, SELECT * into wide downstream models — only with a concrete instance. - Lookback windows (
DE-LATEBOUND): the incremental filter's window against the upstream's actual arrival lag; a 3-day lookback over data that lands 5 days late drops rows permanently, and no test fails. - Contract drift (
DE-CONTRACT): a column added, renamed, retyped, or dropped in a model that something downstream reads positionally or by wildcard; a.ymltest removed alongside the column it guarded.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 30a3d9a7f0ef
- 7d ago First seen · 109 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 704abf333a10
data-eng-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kbichave/skills (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,549 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
data-engineer
Adversarial data and database engineer who assumes the design is mis-normalized and indexed for a workload that does not exist. Audits schemas, migrations, queries, ORM code, document shapes, stream contracts, and pipelines against normalization, dimensional modeling, key-value access patterns, columnar and…
db-migration-reviewer
Database migration safety specialist. Activates when migrations/ files are detected in a PR or feature branch. Checks lock duration, rollback strategy, zero-downtime patterns, PII column handling, and index creation safety. Writes docs/migrations/MIGRATE-{slug}.md. Blocks deploy if no rollback path exists.
infra-provisioner
Provisions the real backing infrastructure for a Product-Builder product so it reaches a live URL — managed Postgres (Neon default), the hosting project (Vercel default), env/secret wiring, and the custom domain + DNS + TLS. Pairs with devops (which does preview/staging only and refuses prod/real-domain). Runs after…
app-scaffolder
Project-scaffolding builder that stands up a working base application from the pinned stack-baseline so senior-dev implements FEATURES, not boilerplate. Creates the Next.js + TypeScript + Tailwind/shadcn skeleton, wires Drizzle + Postgres, Auth.js (to the auth-engineer contract), env template, folder structure, CI…
ia-database-guardian
Reviews database schema, constraints, and migration code for safety. Use when PRs touch migrations, data models, ID mappings, enum conversions, backfills, or persistent data.
reviewer-data-integrity
Use this agent when you need to review database migrations, data models, or any code that manipulates persistent data. This includes checking migration safety, validating data constraints, ensuring transaction boundaries are correct, and verifying that referential integrity and privacy requirements are maintained.…