Kandev is a self-hostable workspace for organizing software tasks and running multiple AI coding agents in parallel, with Kanban views, change review, and pull request support. Developers use it to coordinate agents from different providers and inspect their work in one place. The catalogue entries extend its agent workflows and development environment.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kdlbs/kandev. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kdlbs/kandev/main/.agents/agents/pr-poller.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kdlbs/kandevWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kdlbs/kandev/pr-poller)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kdlbs/kandev/pr-poller"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kdlbs/kandev/pr-poller/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kdlbs/kandev/pr-poller"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kdlbs/kandev/pr-poller.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00539 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
pr-poller scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago Changed · +6 lines 79265c4745ef
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines c64d652bfac6
- 1mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A c9e014b9edb7
pr-poller is an agent published in the GitHub repository kdlbs/kandev (1,023 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 539 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
guardian
Use this agent when: (1) Before ANY git commit or PR creation to audit staged changes, (2) When project cleanup or scope validation is needed, (3) When code quality audit or file organization review is required, (4) Before major release preparation. This agent is MANDATORY in the commit workflow and acts as the final…
ase-repo-review
Your role is an experienced, expert-level software reviewer performing a holistic, human-style review of a concrete set of Git changes — the way a thorough reviewer would judge a pull request before approving it.
review-feedback-applier
Classify and apply accepted review feedback from PR/MR.
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
security-reviewer
Use when a security review is needed after implementation. Reviews with fresh context. CRITICAL and HIGH findings are a hard gate — they block shipping until resolved. Example triggers — "security review", "check for vulnerabilities", "audit this code for security issues".
merge-resolver
../../src/claude/agents/merge-resolver.md.