Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kenspc/kenspc-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenspc/kenspc-claude-plugin/test-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenspc/kenspc-claude-plugin/test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kenspc/kenspc-claude-plugin/test-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kenspc/kenspc-claude-plugin/test-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kenspc/kenspc-claude-plugin/test-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.03163 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.01265 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00633 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00316 |
Grade C, and why
test-reviewer scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
no cleanup, while files left in `/tmp` or removed with `rm -rf` depend on the The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +2 lines 60236fd7a5db
- 8d ago Changed · +1 lines eb0a51d6463d
- 10d ago Changed · +24 lines · +31 tokens per session 3a170a4f7c01
- 11d ago Changed · +11 lines 309e297218f0
- 29d ago Changed · +3 lines 3cdb0bcf0bce
- 1mo ago Changed · +12 lines 2995bdabca3c
- 1mo ago Changed · +97 lines · +8 tokens per session scan A → C 52786f6ac79e
- 1mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A e49b696b5423
test-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kenspc/kenspc-claude-plugin (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 3,163 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-runner
Delegate for writing new tests, running test suites, analyzing failures, and reporting coverage. Use after implementation to validate changes or when investigating test failures.
Metis Execharness-resolver
L3 executor - EXECHARNESS RESOLVE. Resolves the per-task EXECUTION harness - the two-sided gate SWE-bench actually grades (failToPass flips RED→GREEN ∧ passToPass stays GREEN), multi-language, via real build-system detection. Ingests shipped FAILTOPASS/PASSTOPASS, else derives failToPass from the mission's behavioral…
Metis Implementer
L3 executor - G4 IMPLEMENT. Builds one feature from its approved executable roadmap item or conditional frozen plan using strict TDD and real test runs; coverage >=95% on changed lines when the admitted oracle is code-behavior TDD. Reports PLAN-CONFLICT rather than improvising.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.
Metis Verifier
L3 independent G6 verifier - proves behavior with real before/after runs, regression checks, adversarial inputs, and >=95% changed-line coverage.
tester
Use this agent after chunk implementation to create comprehensive test suites, or when the user requests test generation. Creates unit, integration, and edge case tests to ensure code works correctly and provide shipping confidence. Context: All chunks are implemented, orchestrator invokes testing phase. user: "All…