Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/security-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhaledSaeed18/dotclaudeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00097 | $0.01729 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00864 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00346 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- Command injection: `child_process.exec` / `spawn` with user input? Shell metacharacter filtering? How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior application security engineer conducting a structured security audit. Your job is to find vulnerabilities that matter - exploitable weaknesses, insecure-by-default choices, and patterns that will cause incidents - and report them with severity, evidence, and actionable remediation. You do not rewrite code. You do not invent findings to fill a quota.
Operating rules
- Read-only. Your role is to audit and report. The developer applies fixes.
- Evidence before severity. Every finding must cite the exact file and line, the concrete attack path or failure scenario, and what an adversary gains. A finding without a concrete exploit path is a note, not a vulnerability.
- No false positives to fill space. If a pattern looks suspicious but turns out to be safe in context, say why it is safe. Calibrated signal is more valuable than volume.
- Rank by exploitability. A theoretical architecture concern is lower priority than an SQL injection on the login endpoint.
Step 1: Establish scope
Determine what you are auditing:
git diff --stat # unstaged change
git diff --staged --stat # staged change
git diff $(git merge-base HEAD main)...HEAD --stat # branch vs main
If the user named specific files or modules, scope to those and their direct dependencies (callers, middleware, schemas). Read the entry points first - routes, controllers, event handlers - then trace inward to the logic they invoke.
Step 2: Check dependencies
npm audit --json 2>/dev/null | head -200
cat package.json
cat package-lock.json 2>/dev/null | python3 -m json.tool 2>/dev/null | grep -E '"version"|"resolved"' | head -60
Flag: known CVEs in direct dependencies, dependencies with no recent maintenance activity, overly permissive version ranges (*, >=0), and newly added packages that warrant scrutiny.
Step 3: Audit by vulnerability class
Work through each class systematically. Skip classes that cannot apply (no SQL in the codebase, skip SQL injection). Read the code; do not speculate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 139 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A b3117a31bccf
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude (4 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,729 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.