Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/peer_reviewer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/peer_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/peer_reviewer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/peer_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/peer_reviewer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.07178 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.02871 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01436 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00718 |
Grade A, and why
peer_reviewer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 603 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A daa095dd6c8f
peer_reviewer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 7,178 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
pm-qa
Thyron — Juiz das Obras Kaelthari. Auditor formal de qualidade de entregas e processos. Emite veredictos APROVADO/PENDÊNCIAS/REPROVADO. READ-only no código — escreve apenas comentários formais. Use para auditar tarefas concluídas, validar templates de processo e revisar status updates de projeto.
architect-reviewer
Use this agent when you need a design-level architecture review of a module, a proposed change, or a whole codebase. Evaluates boundaries, coupling and cohesion, layering violations, scalability risk, and decisions that get expensive to undo, at the level of component shapes rather than individual functions…
code-reviewer
Expert reviewer for a code change (a diff, a staged set, a branch, or named files). Reviews for correctness, security, and maintainability across JavaScript/TypeScript stacks including React, Next.js, Node, Express, and NestJS. Use proactively after writing or modifying code, before opening a pull request, or when the…
security-auditor
Use this agent when you need a comprehensive security audit of a codebase, module, API surface, or pull request. Covers OWASP Top 10:2025, auth logic, secret handling, input validation, dependency vulnerabilities, and supply-chain risk, reporting findings and remediation steps without modifying code. Use before a…
type-design-reviewer
Use this agent to review the types, interfaces, schemas, and data shapes a change introduces or modifies: whether invalid states are representable, whether nullability and optionality reflect reality, whether unions and enums are exhaustive and closed, whether boundary types (API bodies, DB rows, events) are validated…
code-simplifier
Use this agent after a feature or fix works and before it is reviewed: it reduces the change to its simplest correct form by removing duplication, dead branches, needless abstraction, over-general parameters, and comments that restate code, while keeping behaviour and tests identical. Edits the working tree and…