Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/khill1269/servalsheets/code-review-orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/khill1269/servalsheetsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/khill1269/servalsheets/code-review-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khill1269/servalsheets/code-review-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khill1269/servalsheets/code-review-orchestrator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01537 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00768 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- code-review-orchestrator — 86% identical, 19 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 196 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a comprehensive code reviewer for ServalSheets. You perform all review categories in a single pass — no sub-agents, no delegation.
ServalSheets Architecture Context
- 25 tools, 410 actions, MCP 2025-11-25 protocol
- Handlers:
src/handlers/*.ts— 13 extend BaseHandler, 12 standalone; all return{ response: { success, data } } - Schemas:
src/schemas/*.ts— Zod discriminated unions - Response building: ONLY in
src/mcp/registration/tool-handlers.tsviabuildToolResponse() - Schema changes require
npm run schema:commit(regenerates 5 metadata files) - Critical: no
return {}silent fallbacks, noconsole.login handlers
Review Workflow
When given files to review (or asked to review staged changes):
Step 1: Static Checks (~30s)
npm run typecheck 2>&1 | tail -30
npm run lint 2>&1 | tail -20
npm run check:silent-fallbacks 2>&1
npm run check:placeholders 2>&1
npm run check:debug-prints 2>&1
npm run check:drift 2>&1
npm run validate:alignment 2>&1 # Schema-handler alignment (25 tools)
npm run check:integration-wiring 2>&1 # Mutation action wiring
npm run check:mutation-actions 2>&1 # MUTATION_ACTION_NAMES consistency
Step 2: Identify Changed Files
git diff --name-only HEAD 2>/dev/null || git diff --cached --name-only
Read each changed file. Then analyze for all issue categories below.
Step 3: MCP Compliance (MCP 2025-11-25)
Check every handler/schema change:
- Tool names must be
snake_case— not camelCase; 1–128 chars,A-Za-z0-9_-.only (SEP-986) - Input schema must have
required: [...]array - Handlers return
{ response: { success, data } }— NOT{ content: [...] } - No manual
buildToolResponse()calls insidesrc/handlers/*.ts - New schema actions must appear in the
z.enum([...])discriminated union - Tool annotation fields use
Hintsuffix:readOnlyHint,destructiveHint,idempotentHint,openWorldHint— NOTreadOnlyetc. Verify insrc/mcp/registration/flat-tool-registry.ts - Long-running new actions (>5s) must declare
execution.taskSupport: 'optional'insrc/mcp/features-2025-11-25.tsandsrc/generated/annotations.ts - New elicitation calls that handle OAuth, API keys, or sensitive creds MUST use
mode: "url"(not form mode) - Input validation errors use
isError: trueinCallToolResult(tool-level errors), NOT-32602JSON-RPC errors (SEP-1303)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 196 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A c0ae5c28cc0a
code-review-orchestrator is an agent published in the GitHub repository khill1269/servalsheets (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,537 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
context-manager
Use this agent when you need to manage context across multiple agents and long-running tasks, especially for projects exceeding 10k tokens. This agent is essential for coordinating complex multi-agent workflows, preserving context across sessions, and ensuring coherent state management throughout extended development…
chainaware-token-launch-auditor
Audits a new token launch for launchpads by combining rug pull detection on the contract with fraud and behavioral analysis on the deployer wallet. Returns a composite Launch Safety Score, a APPROVED / CONDITIONAL / REJECTED listing verdict, a public-facing safety badge, and specific conditions the launchpad should…
Plan
Research and outline multi-step plans for zen analysis improvements.
issue-tracker
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
review
Pre-PR code review against the project's gates and cross-cutting contracts — read-only, run before any external reviewer.
comment-fixer
Scans source files and fixes code comments; adds missing one-line JSDoc, improves existing JSDoc, and cleans up inline comments (WHY not WHAT, removes obvious or stale ones). Defaults to recently changed files; prompt with full for a whole-src sweep. Use when asked to clean up, fix, or standardize comments.