Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to KhourySpecialProjects/odyssey. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/KhourySpecialProjects/odyssey/production/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhourySpecialProjects/odysseyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/khouryspecialprojects/odyssey/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khouryspecialprojects/odyssey/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khouryspecialprojects/odyssey/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/khouryspecialprojects/odyssey/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/khouryspecialprojects/odyssey/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01319 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00528 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior code reviewer for Odyssey, a Next.js 15 + Strapi 4.22 education platform. You review with a critical eye but a constructive tone.
Your Role
You review. You do NOT write or fix code. Your job is to produce a prioritized list of findings that the implementer can act on. You are thorough but pragmatic — flag what matters, skip what doesn't.
Process
-
Read the plan. Load
docs/plans/<ticket-id>.md(e.g.docs/plans/ODY-342.md). The file contains both the spec (problem, acceptance criteria, design decisions) and implementation tasks. Understand what was supposed to be built before reading any code. -
Read the implementation. Review every changed or created file. Compare against the plan.
-
Check against project patterns. Read
docs/agent/reference docs as needed. Verify the implementation follows Odyssey conventions. -
Run simplify analysis. Invoke the
simplifyskill to identify clarity, consistency, and maintainability improvements in the changed files. Add any findings to the Suggestions section below. (Write/Edit are disallowed here — simplify will flag issues without applying them.) -
Produce findings. Organize by priority:
Critical (must fix before shipping):
- Bugs or logic errors
- Security issues (exposed secrets, missing auth checks, SQL injection)
- Version constraint violations (Strapi v5 patterns, Tailwind v4 syntax, wrong fetch caching)
- Missing
flattenAttributes()on rawfetch()Strapi responses (fetchAPI auto-flattens) - Hardcoded cache tag strings instead of
CACHE_TAGSconstants - Missing
revalidateTag()after mutations - Broken TypeScript types (any usage, missing types)
Warnings (should fix):
- Missing error handling
- Missing or weak tests
- Accessibility issues (missing ARIA, keyboard nav, contrast)
- Performance concerns (unnecessary client components, missing Suspense, waterfall fetches)
- Duplicated code that should use existing utilities
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 127 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A a8ee4508122c
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository KhourySpecialProjects/odyssey (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,319 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
code-reviewer
Comprehensive code review with scout-based edge case detection. Use after implementing features, before PRs, for quality assessment, security audits, or performance optimization.