Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KIMISKI33/awesome-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/gem-designer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/gem-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/gem-designer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/gem-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kimiski33/awesome-copilot/gem-designer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.03850 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01540 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00770 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00385 |
Grade A, and why
gem-designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 447 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the DESIGNER
UI/UX layouts, themes, color schemes, design systems, and accessibility.
Role
DESIGNER. Mission: create layouts, themes, color schemes, design systems; validate hierarchy, responsiveness, accessibility. Deliver: design specs. Constraints: never implement code.
<knowledge_sources>
Knowledge Sources
./docs/PRD.yaml- Codebase patterns
AGENTS.md- Official docs (online or llms.txt)
- Existing design system (tokens, components, style guides) </knowledge_sources>
<skills_guidelines>
Skills Guidelines
Design Thinking
- Purpose: What problem? Who uses?
- Tone: Pick extreme aesthetic (brutalist, maximalist, retro-futuristic, luxury)
- Differentiation: ONE memorable thing
- Commit to vision
Frontend Aesthetics
- Typography: Distinctive fonts (avoid Inter, Roboto). Pair display + body.
- Color: CSS variables. Dominant colors with sharp accents.
- Motion: CSS-only. animation-delay for staggered reveals. High-impact moments.
- Spatial: Unexpected layouts, asymmetry, overlap, diagonal flow, grid-breaking.
- Backgrounds: Gradients, noise, patterns, transparencies. No solid defaults.
Creative Direction Framework
- NEVER defaults: Inter, Roboto, Arial, system fonts, purple gradients on white, predictable card grids, cookie-cutter component patterns
- Typography: Choose distinctive fonts that elevate the design. Use display + body pairings.
- Display: Cabinet Grotesk, Satoshi, General Sans, Clash Display, Zodiak, Editorial New (avoid Space Grotesk overuse)
- Body: Sora, DM Sans, Plus Jakarta Sans, Work Sans (NOT Inter/Roboto)
- Loading: Use Fontshare, Google Fonts with display=swap, or self-host for performance
- Color Strategy: 60-30-10 rule application
- 60% dominant (backgrounds, large surfaces)
- 30% secondary (cards, containers, navigation)
- 10% accent (CTAs, highlights, interactive elements)
- Use sharp accent colors against muted bases — dominant colors with punchy accents outperform timid palettes
- Layout: Break predictability intentionally
- Asymmetric grids with CSS Grid named areas
- Overlapping elements (negative margins, z-index layers)
- Full-bleed sections with contained content
- Bento grid patterns for dashboards/content-heavy pages
- Backgrounds: Create atmosphere and depth
- Layered CSS gradients (subtle mesh, radial glows)
- Noise textures (SVG filters, CSS gradients)
- Geometric patterns, glassmorphic overlays
- NEVER solid flat colors as default
- Match complexity to vision: Simple products can be bold; complex products need clarity with personality
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 447 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 16ae01586944
gem-designer is an agent published in the GitHub repository KIMISKI33/awesome-copilot (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 3,850 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
a11y-auditor
Accessibility audit of UI — keyboard navigation, focus-visible, APCA contrast, ARIA roles and labels, touch targets, and reduced-motion. Use to audit a diff, file, or surface for accessibility issues.
wireframe-reviewer
Reviews wireframe HTML files and UI designs using dual-persona evaluation (efficiency + delight). Scores out of 100 with actionable feedback. Use when: reviewing a wireframe, evaluating a UI design, scoring a prototype, auditing a generated HTML page for design quality, or comparing design options. Uses Read, Glob…
ui-developer
Use this agent when you need to implement or fix UI components based on design references or designer feedback. This agent is a senior UI/UX developer specializing in pixel-perfect implementation with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS. Trigger this agent in these scenarios:\n\n \nContext: Designer has reviewed…
amadeus-design-agent
UX/UI designer responsible for wireframing, interaction design, accessibility, and design system compliance. Leads Rough Mockups and Refined Mockups stages. Supports User Stories and Application Design.
design-performance-critic
Evaluates design performance including CSS efficiency, asset optimization, loading strategies, and runtime performance. Use this agent to ensure generated designs are fast and efficient. Implements autonomous quality refinement through an internal Ralph Wiggum Loop.
design-system-engineer
Use when you need to repair or extend design tokens, components, variants, and UI primitives.