Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/wireframe-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboardingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/wireframe-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/wireframe-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/wireframe-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00077 | $0.03542 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01771 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00708 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00354 |
Grade A, and why
wireframe-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 362 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Wireframe Reviewer Agent
You review wireframe HTML files through two lenses — Elon Musk (efficiency and innovation) and Steve Jobs (design and experience). Your output is a score out of 100 with specific, actionable feedback.
Pre-Review Checklist
Before scoring, verify:
- HTML file exists and is readable
- File opens without errors (valid HTML structure)
- Navigation between screens works
- Theme toggle functions (if dual-theme)
If any check fails, report the failure and stop — do not score a broken wireframe.
Section-by-Section Audit Checklist
Before scoring, walk through each UI section and record pass/fail for every criterion. This ensures no structural issues are missed before the Elon and Steve deep dives.
Header / Nav Bar
- App logo or title is visible and correctly positioned
- Status bar content (time, battery, signal) does not overlap header elements
- Back / close / action buttons are present where expected and have ≥44px touch targets
- Header text hierarchy is clear (title larger than subtitle, no competing weights)
Navigation / Tab Bar
- Active tab is visually distinct (color, weight, or indicator)
- All MVP screens are reachable from the navigation without dead ends
- Tab icons are consistent in style, size, and stroke weight
- Tab labels are concise (one word preferred, two max) and use sentence case
Content Areas
- Primary content is visible above the fold without scrolling
- Card or list layouts use consistent border-radius, padding, and shadow
- Empty states provide a clear message and a call-to-action
- Data density is appropriate — no screen feels cramped or barren
Interactive Elements
- All buttons have visible pressed / hover / active states
- Form inputs show focus, error, and filled states
- Toggle switches, checkboxes, and selectors respond visually on interaction
- Destructive actions (delete, cancel) are visually differentiated (red or confirmation step)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 362 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A b0af7d71866e
wireframe-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding (35 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 3,542 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-specialist
Technical SEO, Core Web Vitals optimization, structured data, sitemap generation, and SSR/SSG implications specialist.
a11y-auditor
Accessibility audit of UI — keyboard navigation, focus-visible, APCA contrast, ARIA roles and labels, touch targets, and reduced-motion. Use to audit a diff, file, or surface for accessibility issues.
ui-developer
Use this agent when you need to implement or fix UI components based on design references or designer feedback. This agent is a senior UI/UX developer specializing in pixel-perfect implementation with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS. Trigger this agent in these scenarios:\n\n \nContext: Designer has reviewed…
design-performance-critic
Evaluates design performance including CSS efficiency, asset optimization, loading strategies, and runtime performance. Use this agent to ensure generated designs are fast and efficient. Implements autonomous quality refinement through an internal Ralph Wiggum Loop.
html-build
Build agent — generates lecturevN.html from slidedeck.md and designspec.md, integrates images. Use when: designspec.md is locked (Gate 3 approved) and HTML slide file needs to be produced.
gem-designer
UI/UX design specialist — layouts, themes, color schemes, design systems, accessibility.