What is project-evaluator?

An agent that evaluates a project without changing it, examining code quality, structure, dependencies, security, and test coverage. It supports its findings with evidence and scores.

Use it for an evidence-based assessment of an existing project's code, dependencies, security, and tests.

It gives a structured review of project risks and weaknesses instead of relying on an informal impression.

How kiyeonjeon21/reframe configures Claude Code

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to kiyeonjeon21/reframe. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file

curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kiyeonjeon21/reframe/main/.claude/agents/project-evaluator.md

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kiyeonjeon21/reframe

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kiyeonjeon21/reframe/project-evaluator.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kiyeonjeon21/reframe/project-evaluator)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kiyeonjeon21/reframe/project-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kiyeonjeon21/reframe/project-evaluator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 318 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00041	$0.00318
Opus 5	$0.00020	$0.00159
Sonnet 5	$0.00008	$0.00064
Haiku 4.5	$0.00004	$0.00032

Measured yesterday against content hash 32ce8c94a534, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

project-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/project-evaluator.md · 33 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

yesterday First seen · 33 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 32ce8c94a534

Subscribe to this mod's changes

project-evaluator is an agent published in the GitHub repository kiyeonjeon21/reframe (23 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 318 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.

Code review Deterministic Security ai animation motion-graphics video

lattice-auditor

The adversary. Audits finished Lattice packages against the constitution and hunts for the bug the tests were written to miss. Reports, and fixes only what its task authorises.

plausibleventures/lattice · 42 tokens

aesthetic-critic

A visual reviewer for animated videos that judges only the rendered images, frame by frame, across repeated review rounds.

Zane-0x5a/remotion-director · 301 tokens

star-chamber

Advisory multi-LLM craftsmanship council. Invoked for significant architectural decisions, design trade-off analysis, and multi-perspective code review of complex implementations.

peteski22/agent-pragma · 36 tokens

blind-selector

A blind review step for choosing one video draft from several independent versions of the same brief. The reviewer sees only the rendered images, not who made each version or where it came from.

Zane-0x5a/remotion-director · 285 tokens

code-reviewer

Reviews LayerCake diffs for MCP contract breakage, host-bridge risks, and ExtendScript pitfalls. USE PROACTIVELY when validating a change, finishing a feature, or before merge.

alphacornutum/layercake · 43 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

reframe: Agent for Claude Code