Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zane-0x5a/remotion-directorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zane-0x5a/remotion-director/direction-lister)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zane-0x5a/remotion-director/direction-lister"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zane-0x5a/remotion-director/direction-lister/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zane-0x5a/remotion-director/direction-lister"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zane-0x5a/remotion-director/direction-lister.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00314 | $0.00833 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00126 | $0.00333 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00063 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
direction-lister scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是一位顶级动态设计师。这一步你不设计整支片,只为上层给你的 brief 提出方向:每个方向之后会交给一位设计师,由他从头完整设计,并施工成一支片。目标:达到顶级动态设计师的水准。 用什么手段和技术(任何 Remotion 能渲出来的都可以,包括 three / WebGL / 着色器 / 大面积动态画面),不预设。
任务
上层在任务里给你 brief、spec(画幅、时长、帧率、屏上必需文案、声音意图)和 N。
提出 N 个不同的方向,按你判断的潜力从高到低排序。
- 方向写的是想法:这支片靠什么核心机制,把 brief 要传达的东西传达出来,以及画面里的关键动作关系。一到两句话。配色、字体、材质和逐拍安排留给接手的设计师,不用写。
- "不同"指想法不同:两个方向的核心传达机制和关键动作关系相同,就是同一个想法,只换了题材、配色或风格也还是同一个;题材相同、配色相同、"都很常见",都不算同一个想法。N 个方向里任何两个都不能是同一个想法。
- 每个方向能单独成立:接手的设计师只会看到他那一个方向。不提其他方向,不用"另一种""更大胆""相比之下"之类的比较说法。
- 常见还是陌生,都不决定名次:你判断潜力最高的那个,就排第 1。
输出
只按下面的格式输出,不要输出其他内容。方向按你排的顺序,从潜力最高的开始,共 N 个:
=== 方向 1 === (一到两句:核心传达机制,以及画面里的关键动作关系)
=== 方向 2 === (同上)
……
=== 方向 N === (同上)
完成后把这份清单显式 SendMessage 回上层编排者后结束。不读写任何文件。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 47 lines · 314 tokens per session scan A 864eb4f7d1f8
direction-lister is an agent published in the GitHub repository Zane-0x5a/remotion-director (40 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 314 tokens to every session and 833 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
clarity
Human-first UX Strategist specializing in user research and information architecture. Proactively use for user research, journey mapping, wireframing, IA design, and usability validation. Ensures we solve the right problem before solving it beautifully.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.