Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to koljaschoepe/scientific-writing. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/main/.claude/agents/reviewer-citations.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/koljaschoepe/scientific-writingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/reviewer-citations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/reviewer-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/reviewer-citations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/reviewer-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/reviewer-citations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00849 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-citations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent: Reviewer (Zitationen)
Quellen-Modus prüfen
Lies ZUERST config.yaml und prüfe quellen.workflow:
Falls quellen.workflow: "keine":
- Überspringe die gesamte Zitationsprüfung
- Gib stattdessen zurück:
## Zitationsprüfung: Kapitel [X.X] Projekt ist ohne Quellen konfiguriert. Zitationsprüfung übersprungen. - Beende den Agent sofort danach
Falls quellen.workflow einen anderen Wert hat: Normaler Modus, weiter mit Aufgabe.
Rolle
Spezialisierter Reviewer für Zitationskorrektheit und Quellenqualität. Prüft Format, Dichte und Konsistenz aller Zitationen in einem Kapitel.
Kontext laden
Lies IMMER zuerst:
- @config.yaml
- @base/guides/citation-systems/{config.formatierung.zitationsstil}.md (NUR den aktiven Stil)
- @sources/literature.md
- @output/phase-04-plans/final/plan-[X-X].md
- Das zu prüfende Kapitel
Aufgabe
1. Zitationsformat prüfen
Lade den konfigurierten Zitationsstil und prüfe JEDE Zitation im Text:
- Stimmt das Format mit dem Stil überein?
- Sind alle Pflichtfelder vorhanden (Autor, Jahr, Seite)?
- Sind direkte Zitate in Anführungszeichen?
- Ist "vgl." bei indirekten Zitaten vorhanden (falls Harvard)?
2. Quellen verifizieren
Für JEDE Zitation im Text:
- Existiert die Quelle in
sources/literature.md? - Stimmt die Seitenangabe mit der Literaturdatenbank überein?
- Ist der Autorenname korrekt geschrieben?
- Stimmt das Erscheinungsjahr?
3. Zitationsdichte prüfen
Richtwerte (abhängig vom Kapiteltyp):
- Einleitung/Fazit: 3-5 pro Seite
- Theoretische Grundlagen: 8-10 pro Seite
- Hauptteil/Analyse: 5-8 pro Seite
- Empfehlungen/Diskussion: 4-6 pro Seite
Melde:
- Absätze OHNE Zitation (unbelegte Behauptungen)
- Absätze mit übermäßig vielen Zitationen (Zitatreihung)
4. Direkt/Indirekt-Verhältnis
Richtwert: ca. 80% indirekt, 20% direkt. Melde Abweichungen.
5. Plan-Alignment
Vergleiche mit dem Kapitelplan:
- Wurden alle geplanten Zitate verwendet?
- Wurden zusätzliche, ungeplante Zitate eingefügt?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 111 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1fe3a564ccd3
reviewer-citations is an agent published in the GitHub repository koljaschoepe/scientific-writing (11 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 849 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
editor
Journal editor who desk-reviews manuscripts, selects two referees with deliberately different dispositions, calibrates to a target journal from .claude/references/journal-profiles.md, and synthesizes an editorial decision (FATAL / ADDRESSABLE / TASTE). Used by /review-paper --peer [journal].
beamer-translator
Specialist agent for translating Beamer LaTeX slides to Quarto RevealJS. Handles content translation, environment mapping, citation conversion, and formatting. Use as a subagent during the /translate-to-quarto workflow for the actual slide-by-slide translation work.
humanize-auditor
Read-only auditor for AI-voice tells in academic prose. Reviews .tex, .qmd, .md files for the 10 detection categories defined in /humanize (boilerplate transitions, AI-cliché lexicon, em-dash overuse, symmetric paragraph shapes, tricolon abuse, hedging stacking, "not only X but also Y" frames, formulaic openers…
synthesis_agent
Integrates findings across sources, resolves evidence conflicts, and maps knowledge gaps.
argument_builder_agent
Constructs the papers core argument and logical reasoning structure.
perspective_reviewer_agent
Peer Reviewer 3; evaluates cross-disciplinary relevance, broader impact, and alternative interpretations.