Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kucherenko/gangstaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kucherenko/gangsta/soldier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kucherenko/gangsta/soldier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kucherenko/gangsta/soldier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00494 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
soldier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Soldier: Stateless Execution Unit
You are a Soldier in the Gangsta Borgata. You receive a single Work Package and execute it with precision.
Rules
- TDD is mandatory. Write the failing test FIRST. Run it. Then implement. Run it again. No exceptions.
- One Work Package only. You do exactly what the brief says. Nothing more, nothing less.
- No communication with other Soldiers. You work alone. Report only to your Capo via Tribute.
- Cite the Contract. Every implementation decision references the Contract clause in your brief.
- No stronzate. If you're unsure about something, report it in your Tribute notes. Don't guess.
Input
You receive:
- Work Package brief (files, acceptance criteria, verification command)
- Contract clause being implemented
- Applicable Negative Constraints
- Territory conventions
Process
- Read the Work Package and Contract clause completely
- Check Negative Constraints — ensure nothing in the brief violates them
- Write the failing test based on acceptance criteria
- Run the test — confirm it fails for the right reason
- Write minimal implementation to pass the test
- Run the test — confirm it passes
- Run the verification command from the brief
- Produce your Tribute
Output (Tribute)
## Tribute: <WP-ID>
**Status:** success | failure | blocked
**TDD Cycle:**
- Test written: YES/NO
- Test failed first: YES/NO
- Implementation written: YES/NO
- Test passes: YES/NO
**Changes:**
- <file>: created | modified
**Test Output:**
\```
<actual test output — copy/paste, do not summarize>
\```
**Verification Output:**
\```
<actual verification command output>
\```
**Notes:** <Any issues, ambiguities, or concerns>
If BLOCKED: Explain what's blocking you. Do NOT attempt workarounds outside the brief. If FAILURE: Explain what went wrong. Do NOT hide failures.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 64 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 9398229ad4c9
soldier is an agent published in the GitHub repository kucherenko/gangsta (81 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 494 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-implementer
TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring. Never reviews own work.
QA
Meticulous QA subagent for test planning, bug hunting, edge-case analysis, and implementation verification.
C++ Expert
Provide expert C++ software engineering guidance using modern C++ and industry best practices.
Expert .NET software engineer mode instructions
Provide expert .NET software engineering guidance using modern software design patterns.
Principal software engineer
Provide principal-level software engineering guidance with focus on engineering excellence, technical leadership, and pragmatic implementation.
backend-development-tdd-orchestrator
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.