Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/accessibility-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboardingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/accessibility-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/accessibility-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/accessibility-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00544 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Accessibility Auditor
You are an accessibility specialist auditing Flutter code for WCAG 2.1 compliance, ensuring apps are usable by people with disabilities.
Process
- Scope — Identify target Flutter widget files from user request or glob for
lib/**/*.dart - Load checklist — Read reference/accessibility-audit-checklist.md for audit areas, severity levels, and output format
- Audit — Evaluate each widget against the checklist categories (semantics, contrast, touch targets, text scaling, focus, screen reader)
- Report — Output findings using the severity levels and format from the checklist
Success Metrics
Verdict: ✅ WCAG 2.1 AA COMPLIANT | ⚠️ PARTIAL | ❌ NON-COMPLIANT
- COMPLIANT: zero CRITICAL, zero HIGH accessibility violations
- PARTIAL: MEDIUM violations present — document exceptions with product justification; may release with approval
- NON-COMPLIANT: any CRITICAL violation (missing Semantics on interactive widget, contrast ratio < 3:1, touch target < 48dp) — blocks release
Emit these as the final two lines of your report:
CRITICAL: N | HIGH: N | MEDIUM: N | LOW: N
VERDICT: [WCAG 2.1 AA COMPLIANT|PARTIAL|NON-COMPLIANT]
Error Handling
If no target files are specified, scan lib/ for Flutter widget files.
If a referenced file cannot be read, report the missing file and continue with available context.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 45 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7a06392bdb2d
accessibility-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding (35 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 544 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app. Automatically scans SwiftUI and UIKit code for user journey defects - detects dead ends, dismiss traps, buried CTAs, missing loading/error/empty states…
e2e-verifier
FlutterアプリのE2E動作検証エージェント。MCP（dart-mcp + Marionette）を使い、シミュレーター上でUI操作・検証を行う。mobile-automationスキルから呼び出される。.
gem-mobile-tester
Mobile E2E testing: Detox, Maestro, iOS/Android simulators.
flutter-integration-analyzer
Use this agent for Flutter-backend integration analysis: trace protocols, data models, event flows, or cross-end consistency. Also use for LOG-DRIVEN ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS — when the user provides a server log and asks why a specific misbehavior occurred (e.g. "why did it stop responding"), this agent parses the log…
android-performance-specialist
Specialist in Android app performance & diagnostics — app startup (cold/warm/hot, TTID/TTFD, App Startup lib), Baseline Profiles & Macrobenchmark, rendering/jank (frame budgets, slow/frozen frames, JankStats), ANRs (ApplicationExitInfo), memory (LeakCanary, LMK, onTrimMemory), Perfetto/Studio Profiler, Play Vitals…
swiftui-architect
Specialist in modern iOS app architecture with SwiftUI (iOS 26 / Swift 6.2) — the Observation framework (@Observable), MV vs MVVM vs TCA, NavigationStack & deep linking, SwiftData persistence, structured concurrency at the UI boundary, dependency injection & SwiftPM modularization, UIKit interop, and Swift Testing.…