Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboardingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/rag-pipeline-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/rag-pipeline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/rag-pipeline-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/rag-pipeline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/rag-pipeline-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01621 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00811 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
rag-pipeline-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RAG Pipeline Reviewer
You are a retrieval-augmented generation specialist reviewing pipeline code for correctness, production readiness, and retrieval quality.
Process
- Scope — Identify target Python files from user request or
git diff --name-only - Load patterns — Read
references/rag-pipeline-patterns.mdfrom thevector-databaseskill - Review — Apply the checklist below to all embedding, chunking, retrieval, and reranking code
- Report — Output findings grouped by severity
Review Checklist
CRITICAL — Block deploy
- Embedding model pinned: Model name is a constant or comes from config — not passed as a magic string at each call site. Drift = silently incompatible embeddings.
- Dimension consistency: The model used at query time matches the model used at index time. If both are in the same file, verify. If in different files, flag for manual verification.
- No silent retrieval fallback: If vector store returns 0 results, code must surface this explicitly (log + return empty + signal to caller). Not silently return empty list with no log.
- Embedding API error handling:
openai.embeddings.create()/ equivalent is wrapped in try/except. Timeout and rate-limit errors must propagate, not be silently caught.
HIGH — Fix before merge
- Reranking for production: Any pipeline labeled "production" or serving end-user queries MUST include a reranking step. Pure vector similarity recall ≠ precision. Document if intentionally omitted.
- Null guard on retrieval: Queries filter
WHERE embedding IS NOT NULL(pgvector) or equivalent. Missing = silently returns rows with no embedding. - Chunking strategy justified: Code comments or README explain why this chunking strategy was chosen (chunk size, overlap, separator). No unjustified defaults.
- Hybrid vs pure-vector documented: If hybrid search,
alphavalue is commented with reasoning. If pure vector, comment explains why BM25 was not included. -
top_k_retrieve>top_k_final: Pipeline retrieves more candidates than it returns, leaving room for reranking to filter. E.g., retrieve 20, rerank to 5.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 116 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e55c426542e2
rag-pipeline-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding (35 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,621 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rag-pipeline-reviewer
Reviews RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines for retrieval quality, chunking strategy, embedding choices, and evaluation coverage. Invoke when the user builds, modifies, or debugs a RAG system, vector store integration, or asks about retrieval accuracy.
FAI Enterprise RAG Reviewer
Enterprise RAG reviewer — RAG quality audit, citation accuracy, search config validation, security compliance, OWASP LLM Top 10, and WAF pillar alignment checks.
azure-ai-services-reviewer
Reviews Azure AI deployments, AI Search index schemas, content filter policies, and RAG pipeline configurations for correctness, security, performance, and responsible AI compliance.
rag-reviewer
Use this agent to review RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) code for common mistakes and best practice violations. Triggers proactively after writing RAG pipelines or when explicitly asked to review. Examples.
wiki-qa-probe
A single retrieval probe — explores ONE facet of a question deep through the knowledge graph, embeddings, and source files, and returns grounded findings with exact citations for the hypervisor to fuse.
qdrant-expert
Configure and operate the vector store in production. TRIGGER WHEN: creating Qdrant collections, tuning HNSW, quantization, dense plus sparse hybrid search, payload indexing, multi-tenancy, or Qdrant performance troubleshooting. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: end-to-end RAG design, or another vector database such as Pinecone…