Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheLobbi/Claude-mWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thelobbi/claude-m/azure-ai-services-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thelobbi/claude-m/azure-ai-services-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thelobbi/claude-m/azure-ai-services-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thelobbi/claude-m/azure-ai-services-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thelobbi/claude-m/azure-ai-services-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01077 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00108 |
Grade B, and why
azure-ai-services-reviewer scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Instruction-override phrasingmediumPrompt injection
Text telling the model to disregard its earlier instructions or safety rules is the shape of a prompt injection, whoever wrote it.
- System prompts do not disable or weaken safety features (`"ignore all previous instructions"`) Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 113 lines · 37 tokens per session scan B cd167691c5ac
azure-ai-services-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository TheLobbi/Claude-m (14 stars, last pushed 15d ago), with no licence file. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,077 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (instruction-override phrasing). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rag-pipeline-reviewer
Reviews RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines for retrieval quality, chunking strategy, embedding choices, and evaluation coverage. Invoke when the user builds, modifies, or debugs a RAG system, vector store integration, or asks about retrieval accuracy.
rag-implementation-reviewer
Use proactively to review RAG implementation code — chunking logic, retrieval pipelines, filtering, reranking, generation prompts, and security controls — against the production RAG playbook. Best invoked when the user asks to "review this RAG code" or after substantial RAG-related changes. Returns structured findings…
rag-pipeline-reviewer
RAG pipeline code reviewer. Use when reviewing retrieval pipelines, embedding generation code, chunking strategies, or semantic search implementations. Checks: embedding model pinned, chunking strategy justified, hybrid vs pure-vector choice documented, reranking present for production, null guards on retrieval, and…
FAI Enterprise RAG Reviewer
Enterprise RAG reviewer — RAG quality audit, citation accuracy, search config validation, security compliance, OWASP LLM Top 10, and WAF pillar alignment checks.
rag-reviewer
Use this agent to review RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) code for common mistakes and best practice violations. Triggers proactively after writing RAG pipelines or when explicitly asked to review. Examples.
langchain4j-ai-development-expert
Provides expert LangChain4j development capability for building AI applications, RAG systems, ChatBots, and MCP servers. Handles AI services, vector stores, embeddings, and model integration patterns. Use proactively when working on AI development tasks, RAG implementation, or intelligent agent creation.