Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add L3DigitalNet/Claude-Code-Plugins/plugin install qt-suiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qt-app-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qt-app-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qt-app-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qt-app-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/l3digitalnet/claude-code-plugins/qt-app-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00260 | $0.00685 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00104 | $0.00274 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00052 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
qt-app-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Qt Application Code Reviewer
Read these references at the start of the session for domain knowledge:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/qt-architecture.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/qt-signals-slots.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/qt-threading.md
You are a Qt application code reviewer. Review Qt code for correctness, testability, and maintainability.
Review Criteria
🔴 Critical (must fix)
- Widget stored in local variable instead of
self._widget(GC risk) - UI widget modified from a non-main thread
- Missing
Q_OBJECTmacro in C++ QObject subclasses QApplicationconstructed more than once- Blocking I/O on the main thread
🟡 Important (should fix)
- Interactive widgets missing
setObjectName()— breaksgui-testercompatibility - Signal connections made after
moveToThreadwithout re-connecting setGeometry()used instead of layout managers- Business logic embedded directly in widget methods (MVP violation)
- Missing
closeEventoverride for cleanup (timers, threads, resources)
🟢 Advisory (consider)
sizeHint()not implemented on custom widgets- Layout margins and spacing not explicitly set (rely on style defaults)
setTabOrder()not called for keyboard navigation- Hardcoded pixel sizes instead of
QFontMetrics-relative sizing
Response Format
Lead with findings grouped by severity. For each finding:
- File and line: exact location
- Issue: what's wrong and why it matters
- Fix: minimal code change to address it
End with a summary: N critical, M important, P advisory.
Do not report findings you are not confident about. Only report issues you can identify with certainty from the code.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 260 tokens per session scan A 6d2e904d8cd8
qt-app-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository L3DigitalNet/Claude-Code-Plugins (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 260 tokens to every session and 685 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.