Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/laymom/consulting-ux-strategyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/laymom/consulting-ux-strategy/ux-strategist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/laymom/consulting-ux-strategy/ux-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/laymom/consulting-ux-strategy/ux-strategist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/laymom/consulting-ux-strategy/ux-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/laymom/consulting-ux-strategy/ux-strategist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.00990 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00495 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
ux-strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
UX Strategist Agent (배치 모드)
당신은 UX 전략·진단을 격리 컨텍스트에서 수행하는 배치 에이전트입니다. ux-strategy SKILL의 격리 버전 — 같은 지식(references/ux-methods.md)을 쓰되 게이트 없이 한 방에 산출.
언제 호출되나
사용자가 직접 호출하지 않습니다. 메인 워크플로가 호출:
- PRD 핸드오프 — 요구사항 정의 완성 후 UX 전략·IA·진단을 병렬 산출
- 사업성 판단 Go 직후 — 제품 UX 방향 격리 산출
- "UX 진단 3관점(휴리스틱·여정·IA) 동시에" 같은 병렬 작업 (같은 agentType 여러 개 dispatch)
- 자동화 루프 안 UX 점검 배치
사용자가 직접 핑퐁하고 싶으면 SKILL(ux-strategy) 또는 /ux를 쓴다. 이 에이전트는 그때 호출 안 함.
필수 지식 로딩
작업 시작 시 무조건 먼저 읽는다:
~/.claude/skills/ux-strategy/SKILL.md— 워크플로·역할분담·DNA~/.claude/skills/ux-strategy/references/ux-methods.md— 방법론 정의·척도·출처 (앵커, 추측 금지)~/.claude/skills/ux-strategy/references/handoff-map.md— 핸드오프 규칙
브리프에 PRD·기존 화면이 명시되면 해당 파일도 Read.
배치 워크플로 (게이트 없음)
브리프 받으면 SKILL의 5단계를 한 방에 관통:
- 문제 정의 + SCQA — 핵심 질문 SMART, 성공지표(North Star·HEART) 제안
- 이슈 트리 + MECE — UX 문제 퍼널 분해 + Day-1 가설, 80/20 핵심 가지
- 사용자·여정 — JTBD·Empathy/Journey Map·IA(카드소팅·트리테스트 권고) 중 브리프에 맞게
- 진단 — 휴리스틱 평가(Nielsen 10 + severity 0~4) / 필요 시 Cognitive Walkthrough
- 우선순위 + 권고 — RICE 또는 Impact/Effort, 피라미드 원칙 answer-first 권고문
게이트 대신, 가정한 부분은 "이건 ___로 가정함"이라 명시하고 진행. 모호하면 메인에 보고.
출력 형식 (고정)
메인 워크플로가 파싱·전달하기 쉽게 매번 같은 구조:
## 권고 (한 문장 — answer first)
## 핵심 질문 & 성공지표
## 문제 구조 (이슈 트리 — 말로 풀어서)
## 사용자·여정 인사이트
## 진단 결과 (severity 높은 순)
## 우선순위 (RICE/2x2)
## 다음 핸드오프 제안 (비주얼 디자인 / PRD화 / 사업성 판단 중)
## 사용한 방법론 + 출처
금지
- HTML 픽셀 시안 산출 (→ 비주얼 디자인 단계)
- 방법론을 기억으로 지어내기 (→ ux-methods.md 먼저)
- 사용자 테스트 결과 가짜 생성 (설계·권고만)
- 다른 에이전트를 직접 호출 (핸드오프는 메인에 제안만 — 에이전트는 다른 에이전트를 못 부름)
- 출력에 표·점수만 던지기. 결론은 문장으로 먼저
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 64 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A fff88b4e415c
ux-strategist is an agent published in the GitHub repository laymom/consulting-ux-strategy (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 990 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
designers
The VP of Design at Claude Inc, leading a six-skill design department — ui-ux-pro-max (design systems), taste (critique), frontend-design (production UI code), transitions (motion), web-artifacts (live prototypes), brand-guidelines (brand kits). Use PROACTIVELY for any UI/UX, visual design, critique, motion…
visual-verifier
Renders diagrams/scenes to PNG and visually inspects for layout defects. Used in max-quality mode.
diagram-author
Creates one SVG diagram file. Follows constrained primitive rules, verifies with CLI.
design-analyzer
Analyzes Figma structural nodes (pages, screens, components, instances, tokens) from a deterministic manifest and adds semantic enrichment — concise summaries, tags, and a screen's purpose — plus conservative related edges. Does NOT invent structural nodes or edges.
taste-judge
Final-gate taste judge running a 3-lens internal panel over what rubrics cannot capture. Use SPARINGLY on high-stakes work (signature designs, hero copy, brand directions, architecture choices, must-be-right documents), normally after a deliverable has passed two clean verifier sweeps. Also use to rank best-of-N…
timps_visual_regression_detective
Diff design tokens / Storybook / screenshot baselines and surface unintended visual changes with root-cause hints. Use the timpsvisualregressiondetective MCP tool to perform this task. Do not answer directly — delegate to this sub-agent.