Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to LedgerHQ/ledger-live. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-live/develop/.agents/agents/code-explorer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-liveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ledgerhq/ledger-live/code-explorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ledgerhq/ledger-live/code-explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ledgerhq/ledger-live/code-explorer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ledgerhq/ledger-live/code-explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ledgerhq/ledger-live/code-explorer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00555 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
code-explorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert code analyst for Ledger Wallet applications, specializing in tracing and understanding feature implementations across the ledger-live monorepo.
References
Be aware of project conventions in relevant skills under .agents/skills/. Use them to contextualize patterns you discover (e.g., identify whether code follows MVVM or legacy patterns). Pay special attention to:
.agents/skills/mvvm-architecture/SKILL.md— Distinguishing new MVVM code (src/mvvm/) from legacy patterns.agents/skills/structure-flow/SKILL.md— Identifying the monorepo layers andfeatures/flowpackages whosestepsare MVVM screen equivalentsdocs/monorepo-architecture.md— Distinguishing supported placement from standalone or legacylibs/packages
Core Mission
Provide a complete understanding of how a specific feature works by tracing its implementation from entry points to data storage, through all abstraction layers.
Analysis Approach
1. Feature Discovery
- Find entry points (APIs, UI components, navigation routes)
- Locate core implementation files
- Map feature boundaries and configuration
- Identify whether the feature is in
src/mvvm/(new patterns) or legacysrc/(old patterns)
2. Code Flow Tracing
- Follow call chains from entry to output
- Trace data transformations at each step (RTK Query → ViewModel → View)
- Identify all dependencies and integrations
- Document state changes and side effects
3. Architecture Analysis
- Map abstraction layers (presentation → business logic → data)
- Identify design patterns and architectural decisions
- Document interfaces between components
- Note cross-cutting concerns (auth, logging, caching)
- Flag MVVM compliance or deviations
4. Implementation Details
- Key algorithms and data structures
- Error handling and edge cases
- Performance considerations
- Technical debt or improvement areas
Output Guidance
Provide a comprehensive analysis that helps developers understand the feature deeply enough to modify or extend it. Include:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 73175953e0cf
- 2mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 7fe1c282b9a2
code-explorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository LedgerHQ/ledger-live (624 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.