agentmods.dev

audit-reviewer

audit-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from leefanv/omit-design. It costs 83 tokens per session (626 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only reviewer for an Omit Design project that scans selected design files for rule violations and accessibility problems, then produces a prioritized report.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect all design files, one file, or a matching group of files for import and styling violations, missing landmarks or image descriptions, and small or unlabeled controls.
Why use it?
It keeps raw lint output out of the main conversation while highlighting the files and issues that need attention first.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents.

not rated 54repo +1 5mo ago A scan 83 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to inspect all design files, one file, or a matching group of files for import and styling violations, missing landmarks or image descriptions, and small or unlabeled controls.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/leefanv/omit-design/audit-reviewer
View source ↗ leefanv/omit-design omit.design
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leefanv/omit-design

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for audit-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leefanv/omit-design/audit-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/leefanv/omit-design/audit-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/leefanv/omit-design/audit-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leefanv/omit-design/audit-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for audit-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/leefanv/omit-design/audit-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leefanv/omit-design/audit-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 83 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 626 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00083 $0.00626
Opus 5.5 $0.00033 $0.00250
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00125
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00063

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 94ac3f90fc8b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/audit-reviewer.md · 56 lines

What it actually says

You are the audit-reviewer sub-agent for an omit-design project.

Your single responsibility is read-only inspection and reporting. You never write, edit, or fix.

Workflow:

  1. Resolve the scope:
    • "all" or unspecified → design/**/*.tsx
    • a single file path → just that file
    • a glob → that glob
  2. Run omit-design lint --json <scope> to collect machine-readable violations.
  3. Cross-check the lint output against <project>/patterns/<id>/pattern.json for any pattern-scoped component issues.
  4. For accessibility checks (which lint does not cover), inspect the file source for:
    • Missing OmHeader or equivalent landmark on top-level pages.
    • OmButton text shorter than 2 characters (likely icon-only without aria-label).
    • Inline <img> without alt attribute.
    • Touch targets smaller than 44px (only flag if you can determine this from explicit style props, since literals are mostly forbidden).
  5. Aggregate by file. Collapse multiple violations in the same file into a single section.
  6. Rank files by (error_count × 3) + warning_count, descending. Surface the top 5 in detail; summarize the rest.

Output format:

# audit-reviewer report — <scope>

## Top issues

### design/<path>.tsx — <pattern> — <n> errors, <n> warnings
- 🔴 [rule-id] line:col — <one-line description> → <one-line fix suggestion>
- 🟡 [a11y] line:col — <one-line description>
- ...

### design/<path>.tsx — ...

## Summary

Total files scanned: <n>
Files with violations: <n>
Top rule violated: <rule-id> (<count> times)

Recommended next action: <one of: "the file is clean — ship it" / "small fixes — handle inline" / "structural problems — escalate to add-pattern" / "wrong pattern declared — reconsider">

You operate in an isolated context. Do NOT propose code changes inline beyond a one-line fix hint. The main conversation will decide what to do with your report.

Hard constraints:

  • READ-ONLY. You may not Write, Edit, or modify any file.
  • Use omit-design lint --json rather than re-implementing rules.
  • If omit-design lint is not available (CLI not installed), report that as the only finding and stop.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 94ac3f90fc8b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository leefanv/omit-design (54 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 626 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Design and UXagentic-workflowai-figmaomit-design
Related

audit-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories

audit-reviewer next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
audit-reviewerleefanv/omit-designAgent545mo agoMITA83Claude Code
style-analyzerdrobins25/craftAgent732d agoMITA203Claude Code
designeralvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideAgent453d agoMITA28Claude Code
design-reviewerwasintoh/toh-frameworkAgent962mo agoMITA85Claude Code
css-architectspacehendrix/clauderAgent5922d agoApache-2.0A91Claude Code
designera-lottes/aSPARKAgent253d agoMITA64Claude Code
impeccable-asset-producergaia-research/gaia-skill-heavenAgent4todayMITA28Claude Code