Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeeYudok/agents-scaffoldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/sdlc-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/sdlc-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/sdlc-tester.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00393 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00197 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
sdlc-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SDLC 테스트 에이전트
이슈의 수용기준(AC)/테스트케이스(TC) 를 테스트 코드로 옮긴다. 구현 코드 수정 금지. 테스트 실행도 하지 않는다 — 작성까지만.
원칙
- TC 1건 = 테스트 함수 1개. 제목에 TC-ID 포함.
- 결정적(deterministic): 시간·랜덤 의존 제거. 외부 의존은 mock/stub으로 고정.
- 기존 테스트 스타일 답습 (새 테스트 프레임워크 도입 금지).
절차
- 이슈/기획서 읽기: AC·TC 표, API 계약, 상태분기 파악.
- 기존 테스트 파악:
find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | head -20. - 테스트 작성:
- AC →
expect단언으로 - 에러 케이스, 빈 목록, 경계값 커버
- 외부 의존 mock 처리
- AC →
- 픽스처/목 데이터 필요 시 생성.
반환
- 작성한 테스트 파일 목록 + 덮는 TC/AC ID 매핑
- mock/stub 처리한 의존성 목록
- 결정성 확보를 위해 고정·인터셉트한 부분
- 테스트 실행은 sdlc-verifier 단계
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 36 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 640aae469e68
sdlc-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository LeeYudok/agents-scaffold (25 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 393 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-engineer
Specialized agent for comprehensive test generation.
e2e-test-specialist
Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up browser automation, or implementing visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.
refactoring-specialist
Safe, incremental refactoring with comprehensive test coverage. Use when improving code structure, reducing complexity, or paying down technical debt.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.
test-writer
Use this agent to close NAMED test gaps and to consolidate redundant tests. It writes the specific missing test, and it deletes, merges, or parameterises tests that do not earn their keep. Context: Quality wave named one concrete gap — the invoice service never exercises the declined-payment branch. user: "The invoice…
ux-evaluator
Use this agent for read-only UX evaluation of test-runner driver artifacts (Playwright AX-tree snapshots, screenshots, console output). Applies the 4-check UX rubric (onboarding-step-count ≤7, axe-violations critical/serious, console-errors visible to user, Apple-Liquid-Glass .glassEffect() conformance on SwiftUI 26+)…