Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeeYudok/agents-scaffoldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/yd-finguard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/yd-finguard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/yd-finguard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/yd-finguard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/leeyudok/agents-scaffold/yd-finguard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00124 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00050 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
yd-finguard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
yd-finguard Skill 을 작업 계약의 단일 원본으로 사용한다.
역할·절차·산출물 형식은 Skill 에 있는 것을 따르고, 이 파일에 복제하지 않는다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 11 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 569275882343
yd-finguard is an agent published in the GitHub repository LeeYudok/agents-scaffold (36 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 124 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-25.
Other agents, from other repositories
bug-hunter
Expert at detecting bugs, anti-patterns, and potential issues.
code-reviewer
Expert code reviewer for quality and maintainability.
security-auditor
Security expert for vulnerability detection and remediation.
test-engineer
Specialized agent for comprehensive test generation.
product-analytics-specialist
PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude event tracking, funnels, cohorts, and A/B testing specialist. Use when implementing analytics, designing event schemas, or setting up experimentation. Trigger phrases: analytics, tracking, PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Segment, events, funnel, cohort, A/B test, feature flag, conversion…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…