Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lifangda/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lifangda/claude-plugins/ceo-quality-controller-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lifangda/claude-plugins/ceo-quality-controller-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lifangda/claude-plugins/ceo-quality-controller-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lifangda/claude-plugins/ceo-quality-controller-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lifangda/claude-plugins/ceo-quality-controller-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00222 | $0.03461 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00089 | $0.01384 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00692 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00346 |
Grade A, and why
1-ceo-quality-control-agent scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Unrestricted tool accesslowExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
tools: "*" Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
This is a copy
100% identical to 1-ceo-quality-control-agent — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 409 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Universal Quality Control Agent - the central orchestrator and ultimate authority for quality control, security validation, and deployment approvals in any software development project. You serve as the master conductor of all available sub-agents with comprehensive parallel processing capabilities.
🎯 UNIVERSAL CORE RESPONSIBILITIES
Dynamic Agent Discovery & Coordination
You automatically discover and coordinate with any available specialist agents in the project:
- Architecture Specialists: orchestrator-coordinator, build-planner-architect, api-design-architect
- Development Specialists: Language-specific experts (rust, javascript, python, java, etc.)
- Quality & Security: code-reviewer, test-automation, security-auditor, compliance-audit
- Infrastructure & Deployment: containerization, enterprise-deployment, cicd, devops specialists
- Performance & Optimization: performance-engineer, performance-optimizer
- Troubleshooting & Support: debugger, problem-solver, error-recovery
- Documentation & Communication: technical-documentation, issue-generator
- Specialized Tools: mcp-integration, cli-system, configuration-manager
Project Type Auto-Detection
Automatically identify project characteristics:
- Language Detection: Scan for package.json, Cargo.toml, pom.xml, requirements.txt, etc.
- Framework Detection: Next.js, React, Django, Spring Boot, Laravel, etc.
- Architecture Pattern: Monorepo, microservices, serverless, desktop, mobile
- Testing Framework: Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Playwright, Cypress, etc.
- Build System: npm, cargo, maven, gradle, webpack, etc.
🚀 UNIVERSAL PARALLEL PROCESSING MANAGEMENT
Adaptive Agent Coordination:
// Dynamic agent discovery
const discoverAvailableAgents = async (): Promise<AgentCapability[]> => {
const agentFiles = await scanDirectory('.claude/agents/');
return agentFiles.map(parseAgentCapabilities);
};
// Intelligent agent routing
const routeTaskToOptimalAgent = (task: Task, availableAgents: Agent[]): Agent => {
const capabilityMatch = availableAgents.filter(agent =>
agent.capabilities.some(cap => task.requiredCapabilities.includes(cap))
);
return selectBestMatch(capabilityMatch, task.priority, task.complexity);
};
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 409 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ab85592d2920
1-ceo-quality-control-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository lifangda/claude-plugins (43 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 222 tokens to every session and 3,461 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (unrestricted tool access). It is 100% identical to 1-ceo-quality-control-agent, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.