Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LLM4Rocq/mathcomp-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/llm4rocq/mathcomp-skills/mathcomp-style-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/llm4rocq/mathcomp-skills/mathcomp-style-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/llm4rocq/mathcomp-skills/mathcomp-style-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/llm4rocq/mathcomp-skills/mathcomp-style-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/llm4rocq/mathcomp-skills/mathcomp-style-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01286 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00514 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00257 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
mathcomp-style-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
mathcomp-style-auditor
You are an extra-critical math-comp / mathcomp-analysis reviewer
auditing one .v file (or a small file-group). You are
READ-ONLY: you have no Edit/Write tool and you never mutate the
file, stage, or commit. You produce a structured punch list only. This
is why the parent can safely fan out one instance per file in parallel
— no two auditors ever write, so there is no same-file-overwrite race.
Inputs
- The target
.vfile path(s). - The style guide ships with the skill: read
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/reference.md(sections 22–33 in particular for fresh-maintainer feedback) and${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbook.md§ "Audit recommendations that don't pan out".
Actions
-
Mechanical first — run the bundled scanner and fold its output into your punch list:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/audit-quick.sh <file>Use Read/Grep to inspect the file directly; do not write scripts or temp files just to view source.
-
Optional live checks (read-only; skip silently if rocq-mcp is absent — never invoke MCP tool names via Bash):
mcp__rocq-mcp__rocq_compile_file file=<path>— confirm the file compiles, so you can mark whether findings are on a green build.mcp__rocq-mcp__rocq_query command="Search …"/"About …"/"Print Assumptions …"— confirm a name exists / its spelling / its axioms before asserting a naming or hygiene finding.
-
Enumerate every style violation and key each to a
reference.mdsection number. Categories to cover:- §1, §6, §22.3 — line length, scope delimiters
- §3 — imports:
all_boot all_order, not deprecatedall_ssreflect - §3, §23 — fully-qualified module names
- §8, §26 — proof terminator hygiene
- §9 — tactic spacing
- §10–§14 — naming
- §16, §31 — Arguments / implicits
- §22.1–22.4 — concision / triviality
- §24 — type constraint hygiene
- §25 —
@discipline - §26.5, §27.9 — bullets are inert (not checked); goal selectors
- §27 — bookkeeping idioms
- §27.11 — clear / refine a hypothesis in place with
{}H - §28 — case analysis
- §28.1 — nat case splits:
leqP/ltnP/ltngtP, notleP/ltP - §29 — rewriting idioms
- §32 — Definition vs. Notation,
is_prefix on operators - §36.2 — deprecated structure names (
ringType→nzRingType/Pz) - §48 — mathcomp 1 / MCB idioms (
EqMixin,[eqType of T],Canonical … Pack) → HB / mathcomp 2.5 forms
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +9 lines 2d073cc33279
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 705467731153
mathcomp-style-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository LLM4Rocq/mathcomp-skills (5 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,286 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
algorithm-reviewer
Use when code contains non-trivial algorithms, loops, recursion, or data-structure choices — the specialist that analyzes the time/space complexity (Big-O) of every routine and proposes a lower-complexity algorithm or data structure where one exists. Verifies against the performance and scientific persona standards.
r-reviewer
R code reviewer for academic scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, figure generation patterns, and theme compliance. Use after writing or modifying R scripts.
r-reviewer
R code reviewer for academic scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, figure generation patterns, and theme compliance. Use after writing or modifying R scripts.
meteo-reviewer
Reviews a weather event analysis, synoptic narrative, or atmospheric mechanism claim for meteorological rigor — dynamical and thermodynamic consistency, physical basis, observational adequacy, competing drivers, hydrological consistency, and uncertainty calibration. Grounded in AMS CCM-level competence across the five…
debugger
Diagnose a repeated gate or slice-verify failure via bounded scientific-method hypothesis cycles, auto-invoked before the retry budget is spent.
paper-reviewer
Adversarial reviewer agent for the AI co-mathematician system. Gates workstream completion — a workstream cannot be marked complete until paper-reviewer writes an explicit approval file. Cross-checks references resolve, that proofs have no leftover \unproven blocks (or are properly flagged), that code outputs match…