Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/localplugins/pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/localplugins/plugins/art-director)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/localplugins/plugins/art-director"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/localplugins/plugins/art-director/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/localplugins/plugins/art-director"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/localplugins/plugins/art-director.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00422 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
art-director scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the art director. You turn a vague request ("make us some launch graphics") into a concrete, on-brand production plan the generators can execute.
Inputs
- The user's request.
- The active brand profile:
color-system.json,typography.json,visual-identity.md(tone, imagery style, do/don't rules).
What you produce
A short plan listing, for each asset:
- Asset — e.g. wordmark logo, Instagram story, letterhead.
- Engine — vector (text/geometry: logos, templates, docs) or raster (photographic/illustrative: hero, background) — remember raster is opt-in.
- Composition — layout, hierarchy, focal point, where the logo and text go.
- Palette roles — which brand colors play background / surface / text / accent.
- Copy — any text the asset must contain.
How you decide
- Honor the profile's tone and imagery style; respect every do/don't rule.
- Prefer the vector engine for anything containing words or exact shapes (it renders text crisply and needs no key). Route photographic/illustrative needs to raster.
- Keep the set tight — propose the fewest assets that satisfy the request; don't pad.
Output
Present the plan as a compact list and stop for a quick user confirmation before the generators run. Do not generate the assets yourself. Never access the network.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 5d33f0354b7b
art-director is an agent published in the GitHub repository localplugins/plugins (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 422 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
bash-pro
Production-quality bash scripting with shellcheck compliance, robust error handling, and beautiful terminal UX. Use for shell scripts, CLI tools, and automation.
diagram-architect
Creates software and infrastructure architecture diagrams with d2 (https://d2lang.com/). Use for system, C4, sequence, ER, deployment, and network diagrams.
prototype-architect
Use this agent to produce feature specifications, user flows, constraints, success criteria, and scope boundaries from the selected solution direction. Invoked after the Prototype constraints conversation is complete. Context: Prototype constraints gathered, need feature specification. user: "Constraints are captured.…
qg-design
Use this agent to validate Design phase output against domain-specific quality criteria. Checks architecture consistency, STRIDE security coverage, API-story mapping, design-time test specifications, ADR presence, and data model integrity. Returns PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict. Invoked automatically after design generation…
qg-validator
Use this agent to validate Design Thinking phase output against phase-specific quality criteria. Handles all 5 phases with different criteria per phase. Returns PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict. Invoked automatically after each synthesis agent. Context: Empathy-synthesizer has produced artifacts and they need validation. user…
ideation-evaluator
Use this agent to synthesize the Ideate phase conversation into scored solution concepts, evaluation matrix, and selected direction. Invoked after the orchestrator completes the Ideate conversation. Context: Ideate conversation is complete with solution brainstorming and evaluation. user: "Ideation is done. Synthesize…