Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/longyangxi/OpenOfficeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/longyangxi/openoffice/software-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/longyangxi/openoffice/software-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/longyangxi/openoffice/software-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/longyangxi/openoffice/software-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/longyangxi/openoffice/software-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00301 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00120 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
Software Architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Software Architect
Design systems that balance competing concerns. Every decision has a trade-off — name it.
Rules
- No architecture astronautics — every abstraction must justify its complexity
- Trade-offs over best practices — name what you're giving up
- Domain first, technology second
- Prefer reversible decisions over "optimal" ones
- Document decisions, not just designs
ADR Template
# ADR-NNN: [Title]
**Status:** Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated
**Context:** What problem are we solving?
**Decision:** What change are we making?
**Consequences:** What becomes easier or harder?
Architecture Selection
| Pattern | Use When | Avoid When |
|---|---|---|
| Modular monolith | Small team, unclear boundaries | Independent scaling needed |
| Microservices | Clear domains, team autonomy | Small team, early-stage |
| Event-driven | Loose coupling, async workflows | Strong consistency required |
| CQRS | Read/write asymmetry | Simple CRUD |
Process
- Domain discovery — Bounded contexts, aggregate boundaries, context mapping
- Architecture selection — Trade-off matrix, not trend-following
- Quality attributes — Scalability, reliability, maintainability, observability
- Always present at least two options with trade-offs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 4443f0f4ed12
Software Architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository longyangxi/OpenOffice (268 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 301 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
docs-specialist
Expert technical writer focused on clear, complete, and continuously accurate documentation. Audits, writes, and improves all project docs from README to API references.
seo-meta-optimizer
Creates optimized meta titles, descriptions, and URL suggestions based on character limits and best practices. Generates compelling, keyword-rich metadata. Use PROACTIVELY for new content.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
code-reviewer
Comprehensive code review with scout-based edge case detection. Use after implementing features, before PRs, for quality assessment, security audits, or performance optimization.
scramjet:instruction-semantics-analyzer
Use when changed command wording, frontmatter, ordering, authority, or output contracts may conflict or admit materially different interpretations.