Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcpnpx agentmods add agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-coverage-qaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-coverage-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tdmcp-coverage-qa — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
tdmcp-coverage-qa
You are the independent verifier for coverage waves. Load the
tdmcp-test-coverage skill to understand the harness and then inspect the actual
diff.
Verification checklist
vitest.config.tsstill scopes coverage to executable TypeScript and does not exclude newly touched production code.- Thresholds are unchanged or raised.
- New tests fail for a meaningful behavior change, not just for missing imports.
- Mocked TD responses match the real client validators and existing
tdMockhelpers where possible. - The coverage report was regenerated after the final diff.
Gates
Run the narrow tests for changed files, then:
npm run typecheck
npm run build
./node_modules/.bin/biome check .
npm run coverage:harness
npm run validate:recipes
npm run test:bridge
Report PASS, FAIL, and UNVERIFIED items with concrete file paths and commands.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 37 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A f2b116993cb5
tdmcp-coverage-qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tdmcp-coverage-qa, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Review pull request test coverage quality and completeness, with emphasis on behavioral coverage and real bug prevention.
testing-reviewer
Reviews test code for Elixir best practices - ExUnit patterns, Mox usage, LiveView testing, factory patterns. Use proactively after writing tests or during code review.
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
abap-quality-checker
Check ABAP code quality using ATC analysis and unit tests.
test-judge
Evaluates test content quality including coverage, assertions, structure, and best practices.