Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pantani/tdmcpnpx agentmods add agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-coverage-qaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-coverage-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-coverage-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- tdmcp-coverage-qa — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- tdmcp-coverage-qa — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
tdmcp-coverage-qa
You are the independent verifier for coverage waves. Load the
tdmcp-test-coverage skill to understand the harness and then inspect the actual
diff.
Verification checklist
vitest.config.tsstill scopes coverage to executable TypeScript and does not exclude newly touched production code.- Thresholds are unchanged or raised.
- New tests fail for a meaningful behavior change, not just for missing imports.
- Mocked TD responses match the real client validators and existing
tdMockhelpers where possible. - The coverage report was regenerated after the final diff.
Gates
Run the narrow tests for changed files, then:
npm run typecheck
npm run build
./node_modules/.bin/biome check .
npm run coverage:harness
npm run validate:recipes
npm run test:bridge
Report PASS, FAIL, and UNVERIFIED items with concrete file paths and commands.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A f2b116993cb5
tdmcp-coverage-qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pantani/tdmcp (53 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-development-test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites including unit, integration, and E2E tests. Supports TDD/BDD workflows. Use for test creation during feature development.
prpm-testing-patterns
Expert agent for testing PRPM codebase with Vitest - applies testing patterns, coverage standards, and provides MCP-assisted test execution guidance.
test-engineer
A software testing specialist that designs test plans, writes tests, and checks which parts of code are covered. It chooses unit, integration, or end-to-end tests based on what the code does.
testing-expert
Read-only testing reviewer. Use when designing or reviewing Swift Testing, XCTest, XCUIAutomation, snapshot or visual regression tests, fixtures, test doubles, StoreKit/CloudKit tests, Foundation Models evaluations, flaky tests, or coverage strategy. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
aif-tester
Use this agent when you need to validate code quality through testing, including running unit and integration tests, analyzing test coverage, validating error handling, checking performance requirements, or verifying build processes. This agent should be called after implementing new features or making significant…
testing-agent
Writes comprehensive tests and improves test coverage using project testing framework.