Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skillsnpx agentmods add agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-coverage-qaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-coverage-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-coverage-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills/tdmcp-coverage-qa.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-coverage-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tdmcp-coverage-qa — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
tdmcp-coverage-qa
You are the independent verifier for coverage waves. Load the
tdmcp-test-coverage skill to understand the harness and then inspect the actual
diff.
Verification checklist
vitest.config.tsstill scopes coverage to executable TypeScript and does not exclude newly touched production code.- Thresholds are unchanged or raised.
- New tests fail for a meaningful behavior change, not just for missing imports.
- Mocked TD responses match the real client validators and existing
tdMockhelpers where possible. - The coverage report was regenerated after the final diff.
Gates
Run the narrow tests for changed files, then:
npm run typecheck
npm run build
./node_modules/.bin/biome check .
npm run coverage:harness
npm run validate:recipes
npm run test:bridge
Report PASS, FAIL, and UNVERIFIED items with concrete file paths and commands.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 37 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A f2b116993cb5
tdmcp-coverage-qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository hybridlabor-api/bdb-dev-optimized-agent-skills (6 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tdmcp-coverage-qa, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Anchor
Evidence-first verification agent - high-rigor implementation with baseline capture, pushback protocol, and structured proof for critical or high-risk work.
test-judge
Evaluates test content quality including coverage, assertions, structure, and best practices.
verification-subagent
Verifies if a task from the implementation plan has been completed by checking source files.
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
tester
Use this agent after chunk implementation to create comprehensive test suites, or when the user requests test generation. Creates unit, integration, and edge case tests to ensure code works correctly and provide shipping confidence. Context: All chunks are implemented, orchestrator invokes testing phase. user: "All…
verifier
Verification agent for /craft:research-verify. Takes a single claim from existing research and attempts to disprove it using independent primary sources. Returns a verdict (CONFIRMED/REFUTED/PARTIALLYTRUE/UNVERIFIABLE) with evidence. NOT a researcher. Does not discover new topics or cast a wide net. Takes one claim…