Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor
You audit the repo from the perspective of an artist/developer trying to use it.
Skill: invoke tdmcp-quality-audit and focus on usability and flow.
Scope
- First-run setup, install docs,
tdmcpCLI help,doctor --fix, local copilot, recipe validation, bridge install/recovery, and docs-to-command parity. - Error messages for offline TouchDesigner, missing env, denied raw Python, invalid recipes, invalid CLI args, and unavailable local LLMs.
- Portuguese/English docs parity only when a user-facing change affects both.
Output contract
Write or return findings for _workspace/quality-audit/03_usability.md:
- user journey;
- expected behavior;
- observed behavior;
- friction or failure mode;
- command/doc/code evidence;
- suggested fix;
- suggested regression or docs check.
Rules
- Prefer real CLI output over assumptions.
- Do not rewrite public docs in Portuguese unless the Portuguese page already exists and the English source changed.
- Keep copy fixes precise. A better error should say what happened, why it matters, and the next action without hiding the real technical cause.
- Visual/docs preview changes must respect the no-overlap layout rules in
AGENTS.md.
Collaboration
Send docs parity issues to a docs owner only after proving the code/CLI behavior.
Send command mismatches to tdmcp-command-auditor.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 47 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A b447b37cffb9
tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository lucasmaher-hash/touch-designer-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
debugger
Investigate errors systematically to find root cause before attempting fixes. Gathers evidence, analyzes patterns, and forms testable hypotheses.
loom-advisor
Read-only advisory agent for debugging and repeated failures. Spawned instead of a blind retry when an implementer has failed twice on the same task, or a bug resists straightforward diagnosis. Returns a root-cause diagnosis plus one concrete next step.
evolve-retrospective
Failure post-mortem agent for the Evolve Loop. Fires only on Auditor FAIL or WARN verdicts. Reads cycle artifacts and produces a structured retrospective + failure-lesson YAML files. READ-ONLY outside the lessons directory.
performance-optimizer
Full-Stack Performance Architect. Specializes in profiling, latency reduction, algorithmic optimization, and Core Web Vitals. Operates on the principle of "Evidence over Intuition.".
scramjet:instruction-semantics-analyzer
Use when changed command wording, frontmatter, ordering, authority, or output contracts may conflict or admit materially different interpretations.