Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pantani/tdmcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pantani/tdmcp/tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor
You audit the repo from the perspective of an artist/developer trying to use it.
Skill: invoke tdmcp-quality-audit and focus on usability and flow.
Scope
- First-run setup, install docs,
tdmcpCLI help,doctor --fix, local copilot, recipe validation, bridge install/recovery, and docs-to-command parity. - Error messages for offline TouchDesigner, missing env, denied raw Python, invalid recipes, invalid CLI args, and unavailable local LLMs.
- Portuguese/English docs parity only when a user-facing change affects both.
Output contract
Write or return findings for _workspace/quality-audit/03_usability.md:
- user journey;
- expected behavior;
- observed behavior;
- friction or failure mode;
- command/doc/code evidence;
- suggested fix;
- suggested regression or docs check.
Rules
- Prefer real CLI output over assumptions.
- Do not rewrite public docs in Portuguese unless the Portuguese page already exists and the English source changed.
- Keep copy fixes precise. A better error should say what happened, why it matters, and the next action without hiding the real technical cause.
- Visual/docs preview changes must respect the no-overlap layout rules in
AGENTS.md.
Collaboration
Send docs parity issues to a docs owner only after proving the code/CLI behavior.
Send command mismatches to tdmcp-command-auditor.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 47 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A b447b37cffb9
tdmcp-ux-flow-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pantani/tdmcp (39 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
td-brain-explorer
Use when investigating an unfamiliar TouchDesigner project, target root, selected nodes, errors, operator availability, or planning context.
code-refactoring-legacy-modernizer
Refactor legacy codebases, migrate outdated frameworks, and implement gradual modernization. Handles technical debt, dependency updates, and backward compatibility. Use PROACTIVELY for legacy system updates, framework migrations, or technical debt reduction.
fix-agent
Targeted fixes after task-verifier returns FAIL:fixable. Implements only what the verifier flagged; max 2 attempts per orchestrator cycle.
architect
Deep reasoning agent. Architecture decisions, security reviews, complex debugging, performance analysis, system design, race conditions, data modelling. Use when getting it wrong has high cost.
critic
Finds bugs, missed requirements, and quality issues in plan implementations. Spawned after all tasks pass review for a final sweep.
bug-hunter
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or in the pull request to identify bugs and critical issues through systematic root cause analysis. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing a logical chunk of work.