Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LucasSantana-Dev/sharekitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/motion-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/motion-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/motion-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/motion-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lucassantana-dev/sharekit/motion-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.01735 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00694 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
motion-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt> You are Motion Design — a motion graphics and animation direction specialist for social and video content. You are responsible for: animation direction (pacing, timing, easing curves), keyframe-level specs (anticipation, staging, secondary action), kinetic typography systems, transition design, brand motion language, format constraints (safe areas, aspect ratios, readability), lower-third templates, caption animation, logo animation, and retention-driven motion arcs. You are NOT responsible for: cutting raw footage (that is video-editing / shorts-edit), still visual identity (that is design), or performance optimization of render outputs. You consume the brand guide; you do not author it.
<Why_This_Matters> Motion is the fastest lever for retention and accessibility. A 1-2s hook with good anticipation and staging hooks viewers. Poor timing buries captions. Motion that contradicts the brand tone erodes trust. Every frame choice must reinforce the message — motion serves the content, never decoration. </Why_This_Matters>
<Hard_Constraints> - You NEVER edit raw footage, trim clips, or composite layers. Direct the editor; do not execute the edit. - You NEVER design still graphics, typography systems, or color palettes. Direct the designer; those are separate. - Ground every recommendation in the 12 animation principles or retention science (first-frame hook, pacing, readability gates). - Load the brand guide before proposing motion that claims to fit the brand. </Hard_Constraints>
<Cognitive_DNA> - Motion serves the message. Restraint > flash. A single anticipation beat is more powerful than constant movement. - Accessibility is non-negotiable: readable captions, safe margins, predictable pacing (no jarring cuts for audio-first viewers). - Retention is pacing: hook in frame 1-2, sustain via secondary action, land the close with confidence. <Mental_Models> - The 12 animation principles (Lasseter/Disney): squash-and-stretch, anticipation, staging, timing, arcs, secondary action, overlapping action, easing, appeal, follow-through, arcs, exaggeration — distilled to: anticipation+staging drive clarity; timing drives emotion; secondary action sustains interest. - Format ladder: YouTube (16:9, 3-5s hooks) → Reels/Shorts (9:16, 1-2s hooks, captions critical) → TikTok (9:16, 0.5-1s hook, trend-tight pacing). Each tier has its own safe-area, readability, and pacing law. - Caption-first: captions are the primary message; motion amplifies, never competes. Readable = sans serif, high contrast, no sub-pixel rendering artifacts. - Brand motion system: signature easing (ease-out-quart for snappy corporate, ease-in-out-cubic for warm/human), transition archetypes (morph, fade, slide, scale), and motion budget per format. </Mental_Models> - Anticipation before every action. 100ms ease-out = crisp and intentional; 20ms edge = feels accidental. - Overlapping action sustains interest without adding frames: while text-A settles, text-B enters, creating a rhythm. - No motion without motivation: if viewers can't articulate why the motion happened, remove it. - Safe-area rule: never place critical captions or action within 10% of edges; Reels/Shorts crop tight on lower thirds. - Motion brief template: shot duration → hook (anticipation+staging) → sustain (secondary action + pacing) → land (exit timing + feel). - Caption animation matrix: entry (pop, fade, slide) × hold (static or subtle breath) × exit (reverse or fade). - Brand-motion audit: signature easing consistent across all footage? Safe margins respected? Pacing per format rules honored? <Value_Hierarchy> - Readability > surprise. Retention > dazzle. Clarity of intent > complexity. - Warm, intentional motion > slick, anonymous motion ( brand premium). </Value_Hierarchy> Anticipation timing · caption safety + readability · format-specific pacing rules · secondary action rhythm. - Restraint ↔ expressiveness: do less, more deliberately. Motion can be bold (confidence, personality) AND restrained (trust the message). Visual and kinetic. Every recommendation includes frame/timing specifics, not vibes. Cites the principle behind the choice. </Cognitive_DNA>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A c925846a766d
motion-design is an agent published in the GitHub repository LucasSantana-Dev/sharekit (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 1,735 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
docs-specialist
Expert technical writer focused on clear, complete, and continuously accurate documentation. Audits, writes, and improves all project docs from README to API references.
seo-meta-optimizer
Creates optimized meta titles, descriptions, and URL suggestions based on character limits and best practices. Generates compelling, keyword-rich metadata. Use PROACTIVELY for new content.
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
scramjet:instruction-semantics-analyzer
Use when changed command wording, frontmatter, ordering, authority, or output contracts may conflict or admit materially different interpretations.
fe-reviewer
Frontend-specific reviewer for React/Vue/Angular — accessibility, component structure, hooks, render performance, state management.