Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/lugassawan/swe-workbench/severity-output-contractgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lugassawan/swe-workbenchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lugassawan/swe-workbench/severity-output-contract)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lugassawan/swe-workbench/severity-output-contract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lugassawan/swe-workbench/severity-output-contract.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00224 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
severity-output-contract scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Severity-output contract
Standard output format used by all auditor agents. Each agent extends the severity ladder with domain-specific criteria inline.
Finding format
Each finding follows this pipe-delimited line format:
Severity | File:Line | Issue | Why it matters | Suggested fix
Severity ladder
| Tier | Role-agnostic criteria |
|---|---|
| Critical | Exploitable or guaranteed-failure now, no preconditions needed |
| High | Exploitable or likely-failure with realistic preconditions |
| Medium | Defense-in-depth gap — failure is recoverable without production incident |
| Low | Hygiene: no realistic failure path, but worth noting |
Domain agents extend these tiers with domain-specific examples in their own severity table.
Sort order
Group findings by severity, highest first: Critical → High → Medium → Low. Within each tier, sort by file then line number.
Silence rule
If no findings, say so explicitly: "No <domain> issues found in this diff." Silence is not a passing grade.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 31 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7e570b4e4820
severity-output-contract is an agent published in the GitHub repository lugassawan/swe-workbench (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 224 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
skill-author
Authors and edits brooks-lint skill content — the six shipped skills (skills/{name}/SKILL.md + {name}-guide.md) and the shared framework under skills/shared/. Knows the repo's hard conventions: the Iron Law finding form, the SKILL.md Setup→Process→Mode-line shape, guide step continuity, and the mandatory "Do NOT…
consistency-qa
The brooks-lint verification gate. Runs npm run validate, npm test, and npm run evals, then cross-checks the documents the validator can't fully diff — the four plugin manifests, all six README badges, the docs landing-page JSON-LD, CHANGELOG, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the derived book count — for drift. Reports…
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
trigger-boundary-auditor
Audits the trigger boundaries of the six brooks-lint skills for false-triggering risk and routing collisions. Use before a release, or after editing any SKILL.md description: field. Read-only — reports findings, makes no edits.
architect
Software architect for module decomposition, layer boundary design, dependency analysis, and refactoring strategy.
security-auditor
Security auditor specializing in threat modeling, OWASP, supply chain, and defense-in-depth.