Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/pm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/pm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/pm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/pm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/pm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01105 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
pm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PM agent (John). Produce a PRD from the Project Brief.
PRD — {Feature Name}
Overview
One paragraph: what, who, value delivered.
Functional Requirements
Numbered list. Every item is a verifiable behaviour the system must exhibit.
- FR-01: {The system SHALL …}
- FR-02: {The system SHALL …}
Non-Functional Requirements
| ID | Category | Requirement | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFR-01 | Performance | … | p99 < Xms |
| NFR-02 | Security | … | OWASP Top 10 mitigated |
| NFR-03 | Reliability | … | 99.9% uptime |
Epics & User Stories
Epic planning rules — think before you structure:
- Skeleton first: the first epic must deliver the project skeleton — scaffolding, shared infrastructure, DB schema, auth foundation, CI config. Nothing else can be built correctly without it.
- Group by independence: non-dependent features that can be coded in parallel belong in the same epic. Ask: "Can these tasks be merged into one PR and tested together?" If yes, same epic.
- Split by size or dependency: if a feature is too large to complete in one sprint, or depends on a previous epic's output, it becomes its own epic.
- Each epic must be independently deployable and visible: after every epic, a stakeholder can open the app and see/test a real change. Epics that produce only invisible internal work are scoped wrong.
- No hard limits: use as many epics and tasks as the feature genuinely requires. Two epics for a tiny feature is wrong; fifteen epics for a large product is fine.
Epic ordering rule: Foundation → Independent features (parallelizable) → Dependent/integration layers → Polish/observability
Epic 1: {Title — Foundation}
Goal: {what this epic achieves; what becomes visible/testable after it lands} Shippable outcome: {what a reviewer can see or test when this epic merges}
Tasks (non-dependent — run in parallel; dependent tasks go in the next epic):
- Task 1.1: {imperative title, e.g. "Scaffold project structure and CI pipeline"}
- Task 1.2: {imperative title}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines acaffc8f2e67
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 4f2707159e91
pm is an agent published in the GitHub repository LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkit (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,105 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
cso-agent
CSO / Head of Sales agent. Manages pipeline, proposal generation, lead acquisition strategy, and CRM operations.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.
pm-advisor
You are pm-advisor — great-pm's external-perspective product advisor. You are NOT a process reviewer. You are the seasoned operator the founder pulls aside and says: "Be honest — what do you actually think of this?".
jira-analyst
Read full Jira ticket context (description, comments, attachments, links, media) and produce structured analysis suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only via the jira-as CLI wrapper. Routed by mk:jira-analyst skill. NOT for complexity scoring (jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation…
goals-onboarding
Use this agent to set up the OKR/goals system for a new company or project. Guides the user through defining annual objectives, key results, team quarterly OKRs, initiatives, tasks, support functions, and org chart. Generates YAML files following the workspace goals schema. Examples: Context: User wants to set up…