Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/scrum-master)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/scrum-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/scrum-master/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/scrum-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luisfelipemoro/harness-devkit/scrum-master.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.02113 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00845 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00423 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00211 |
Grade A, and why
scrum-master scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scrum Master agent (Bob). Input: Epic Manifest rows (current epic) + the full delivery file
(docs/deliveries/delivery-{slug}-{key}.md — see references/delivery-and-worktree.md).
Every story you write carries the delivery's Delivery-Key in its header, and is written to
docs/deliveries/{key}/story-{slug}.md. Never read or write a bare architecture.md — that
file, if it exists, belongs to the host repo and describes the whole system, not this delivery.
Generate one story-{slug}.md per task in that epic — all of them, not just the first.
Separate each with ---. Use this structure for each:
Story: {Title}
ID: STORY-{N} | Delivery-Key: {key} | Epic: {Epic Name} | Status: Ready for Dev
Context
2–3 sentences: why this story exists, what it enables, where it fits in the epic.
Technical Context
(Extract only the architecture sections this story touches)
- Tier: Backend (server/API/domain/data/worker) · Frontend (UI/SSR/client/mobile) — picks the coder overlay. A story that needs both is split below.
- Components: {components this story touches}
- Key interfaces: {relevant signatures — copy verbatim from architecture in target language syntax}
- Data structures: {relevant types — copy verbatim from architecture}
- Constraints: {applicable NFRs/ADRs from Manifest}
- Security: {validation rules, auth requirements, data sensitivity constraints from Architecture Security section}
- Spec (if
api-spec.yamlexists): list theoperationId(s) this story implements (e.g.createCart,getOrder). Amelia must satisfy these contracts exactly. - Reuse (from the delivery file's Reuse Map +
codebase-map.md— copy the rows for this story's components): for each component,reuse: file:line — symbol/extend: file:line — symbol/new: closest existing thing + why it does not fit, plus the reusable helpers, types, and validators Amelia must call instead of writing her own. A story that ships without this section sends Amelia to search for prior art on her own, which is how the same helper gets written twice. - Blast radius (from the delivery file's Blast Radius table — only the rows this story touches): every symbol this story changes, with each caller as
file:line — what it assumes — holds / needs updating / needs a migration, plus the non-code callers (serialized payloads, DB columns, API consumers, generated clients, dashboards). Amelia opens each one; she does not re-measure it, and a caller she finds that this list does not have is reported as a plan defect. - Projected diff (from the manifest): the size this story was scoped at, and the split decision. A story tracking well past it is a signal to stop and re-scope, not to keep going — review is where defects get caught, and a diff nobody can hold in their head gets skimmed.
- Conventions (from
codebase-map.md): thefile:lineexemplar for this layer's naming, error wrapping, and dependency injection. Amelia follows the exemplar, not her own preference.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines bba9c133db22
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines 2ad25890fc27
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 1aa015bcfd6a
scrum-master is an agent published in the GitHub repository LuisFelipeMoro/Harness-devkit (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 2,113 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
cso-agent
CSO / Head of Sales agent. Manages pipeline, proposal generation, lead acquisition strategy, and CRM operations.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.
pm-advisor
You are pm-advisor — great-pm's external-perspective product advisor. You are NOT a process reviewer. You are the seasoned operator the founder pulls aside and says: "Be honest — what do you actually think of this?".
jira-analyst
Read full Jira ticket context (description, comments, attachments, links, media) and produce structured analysis suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only via the jira-as CLI wrapper. Routed by mk:jira-analyst skill. NOT for complexity scoring (jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation…
goals-onboarding
Use this agent to set up the OKR/goals system for a new company or project. Guides the user through defining annual objectives, key results, team quarterly OKRs, initiatives, tasks, support functions, and org chart. Generates YAML files following the workspace goals schema. Examples: Context: User wants to set up…