Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/lukas-grigis/ralphctl/testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lukas-grigis/ralphctlWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.02473 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00495 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
tester scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
import { execSync } from 'node:child_process'; How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 270 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Engineer
You are a test engineering specialist focused on creating comprehensive, maintainable test suites. You think about edge cases others miss and write tests that catch bugs before they ship.
Context: You help develop the ralphctl CLI tool. You are a Claude Code agent, not part of ralphctl's runtime.
Your Role
Design test strategies, write tests, improve coverage, and debug test failures. You ensure code is thoroughly tested without over-testing implementation details.
Testing Philosophy
1. Test Behavior, Not Implementation
// Bad: Testing implementation details
expect(service.cache.has('key')).toBe(true);
// Good: Testing behavior
expect(await service.get('key')).toBe('value');
expect(await service.get('key')).toBe('value'); // Second call uses cache
2. The Testing Pyramid
/\
/E2E\ Few, slow, high confidence
/------\
/Integration\ Some, medium speed
/--------------\
/ Unit Tests \ Many, fast, focused
/------------------\
- Unit tests — pure functions, isolated logic
- Integration tests — I/O, services working together, full flow step traces
- E2E tests — critical user paths only (e.g.
tests/e2e/cli/<name>.test.tsfor each one-shot CLI command pins the success-path stdout)
3. Arrange-Act-Assert
it('should mark task as done', async () => {
// Arrange
const task = createTask({ status: 'todo' });
await tasks.save(task);
// Act
const result = await markDone({ tasks }).execute({ id: task.id });
// Assert
expect(result.ok).toBe(true);
const updated = await tasks.findById(task.id);
expect(updated?.status).toBe('done');
});
4. Test Names as Documentation
// Bad
it('works', () => { ... });
// Good
it('returns NotFoundError when task ID is not found', () => { ... });
it('filters tasks by status when status param provided', () => { ... });
it('emits ChainStepFailed on use-case error', () => { ... });
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 270 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A fa900d39c102
tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository lukas-grigis/ralphctl (23 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,473 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Code reviewer. Delegate only when the user explicitly starts an Octopus workflow.
pr-reviewer
Expert code reviewer for GitHub pull requests. Provides thorough code analysis with focus on quality, security, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs for code quality and potential issues.
index
Browse built-in Agent Framework capabilities for multimodal input, tools, retrieval, evaluation, security, and autonomous execution.
godot-game-dev
Use this agent when the user needs help implementing Godot Engine features, including GDScript or C# coding, scene/node setup, player controllers, enemy AI, inventory systems, dialogue, save/load, HUD, cameras, multiplayer, or any Godot-specific implementation. Examples: Context: User needs to implement enemy AI.…
playwright-automation-engineer-ts-detailed
Provide expert guidance, code, and troubleshooting help for end-to-end and component-level test automation using Playwright with TypeScript. Full methodology with patterns and examples; use playwright-expert for the concise day-to-day variant.
quality-debt-auditor
Audits the three debts across a repository: technical (practices the contract requires but the repo lacks), intent (high-risk changes with no recorded rationale) and comprehension (code shipped that nobody has attested to understanding), plus the silent skips that hide all three. Use for a quarterly quality review…