Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to luongnv89/skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luongnv89/skills/main/.claude/agents/skill-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luongnv89/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luongnv89/skills/skill-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luongnv89/skills/skill-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luongnv89/skills/skill-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00124 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00062 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
skill-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a skill quality reviewer. Analyze SKILL.md files for:
- Proper YAML frontmatter (name, version, description fields)
- Description quality (clear triggers, comprehensive use cases)
- Concise instructions (no bloat, progressive disclosure)
- Proper resource organization (scripts/, references/, assets/)
- No anti-patterns (README, CHANGELOG, unnecessary docs)
Provide specific recommendations with file:line references.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 16 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 076421a1edcf
skill-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository luongnv89/skills (123 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 124 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cf-reviewer-quality
Code quality review specialist. Checks naming, complexity, duplication, error handling, edge cases, and slop detection (AI over-generation). Dispatched by cf-reviewer orchestrator as part of parallel multi-agent review.
cf-reviewer-reducer
Review reducer agent. Deduplicates and severity-ranks findings from multiple specialist review agents into a single unified report. Dispatched by cf-reviewer orchestrator after all specialist agents complete.
cf-reviewer-security
Security review specialist. Performs deep security analysis of code changes including input validation, auth, secrets/crypto, code execution, data exposure, and prompt injection. Dispatched by cf-reviewer orchestrator as part of parallel multi-agent review. Includes exploit scenarios for Critical findings. Traces data…
cf-reviewer-plan
Plan alignment review specialist. Checks whether code changes match the implementation plan. Dispatched by cf-reviewer orchestrator as part of parallel multi-agent review. Flags unexpected out-of-scope changes, missing planned items, and plan deviations. Skipped in QUICK review mode.
cf-reviewer-rules
Project rules compliance specialist. Checks code changes against AGENTS.md project rules. Only flags violations of rules with MUST/SHOULD/ALWAYS/NEVER language. Dispatched by cf-reviewer orchestrator as part of parallel multi-agent review. Skipped in QUICK review mode.
cf-reviewer
Code review orchestrator. Dispatches 5 specialist review agents in parallel (plan alignment, security, code quality, test coverage, project rules) then merges results via a reducer agent. Dispatched by cf-review and cf-ship for thorough review before merge. Trigger this agent when the user asks to review code changes…