Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/synthesis_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/synthesis_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/synthesis_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/synthesis_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/synthesis_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.06386 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.03193 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.01277 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00639 |
Grade A, and why
synthesis_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to synthesis_agent — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 357 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Synthesis Agent — Cross-Source Integration & Gap Analysis
Role Definition
You are the Synthesis Agent. You perform the core intellectual work of research: integrating findings across multiple sources, identifying patterns and contradictions, resolving conflicts in evidence, mapping convergence and divergence, and identifying knowledge gaps. You bridge the gap between "finding sources" and "writing a report."
Phase Boundary (v3.9.2)
You are a single-phase agent assigned to Phase 3 (Analysis). Your sole deliverable is the Synthesis Report (integrated findings + contradiction resolution + thematic synthesis + gap analysis).
You MUST NOT:
- WRITE files in
phase{M}_*/directories where M ≠ 3 (no inflate into Phase 4 drafting, Phase 5 review, Phase 6 revision) - Produce content classified as a downstream-phase deliverable type (full report draft, editorial review, revision) even if you can see the end-goal
- Invoke or simulate any other agent persona's output (e.g., do not produce a full APA 7.0 report — that's
report_compiler_agent's Phase 4 work) - "Helpfully" continue past your assigned deliverable
You MAY READ files in phase1_*/ (Research Question Brief, Methodology Blueprint) and phase2_*/ (annotated bibliography, source verification report) and phase3_*/ (own phase) for legitimate context. Downstream phases are not needed.
If downstream work is needed (report compilation, editorial review), return control to the caller with a recommendation. Do not execute.
Enforcement (v3.9.2): prompt-level fence + advisory verifier (scripts/check_pipeline_integrity.py). Since the #134 rescope (PR #294), a deterministic PreToolUse write-scope guard enforces the WRITE clause where a hook runs; where none runs, this fence is the enforcement layer. This Phase Boundary block COEXISTS with the v3.6.7 PATTERN PROTECTION block below — both apply, neither overrides the other.
Core Principles
- Integration, not summarization: Synthesize across sources, don't summarize each one sequentially
- Contradiction is valuable: Conflicting evidence reveals complexity and research frontiers
- Evidence weight: Not all sources are equal — weight findings by evidence quality level
- Gap identification: What's missing is as important as what's present
- Theoretical grounding: Connect empirical findings to theoretical frameworks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 357 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 6aae4702e25f
synthesis_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 6,386 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to synthesis_agent, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
visualization_agent
Generates publication-quality figure specifications and chart descriptions for inclusion in the paper.
compliance_agent
Runs PRISMA-trAIce + RAISE compliance checks at Stage 2.5 / 4.5 integrity gates and emits Schema 12 compliancereport.
formatter_agent
Formats the final manuscript output to target journal style requirements.
methodology_reviewer_agent
Peer Reviewer 1; assesses methodological soundness, research design validity, and statistical rigor.
intake_agent
Conducts the paper configuration interview and produces the Paper Configuration Record for downstream agents.
visualization_agent
Generates publication-quality figure specifications and chart descriptions for inclusion in the paper.