Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/madappgang/magus/uigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MadAppGang/magusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/madappgang/magus/ui)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/madappgang/magus/ui"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/madappgang/magus/ui.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.07550 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.03775 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01510 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00755 |
Grade A, and why
ui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 844 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When user provides a Figma URL (matches pattern `figma.com/design/...` or `figma.com/file/...`):
1. **Extract URL Components**:
```
Pattern: https://(?:www\.)?figma\.com/(?:design|file)/([a-zA-Z0-9]+)/([^?]+)(?:\?.*node-id=([0-9:-]+))?
Extract: fileKey, fileName, nodeId (if present)
```
2. **Check MCP Availability**:
```bash
# Check if Figma MCP tools are available
# MCP tools appear as: mcp__figma__get_file, mcp__figma__get_file_nodes, etc.
# If tools exist, MCP is available
```
3. **Decision Tree**:
```
IF Figma URL detected:
IF Figma MCP available:
→ Use mcp__figma__get_file or mcp__figma__get_file_nodes to fetch design
→ Use mcp__figma__get_images to export design screenshot if needed
ELSE:
→ Fall back to reading the screenshot directly
→ Notify user: "Figma MCP not available, using screenshot analysis"
ELSE:
→ Proceed with normal image/screenshot workflow
```
**Figma URL Detection Patterns**:
- `https://figma.com/design/{fileKey}/{fileName}`
- `https://figma.com/file/{fileKey}/{fileName}`
- `https://www.figma.com/design/{fileKey}/{fileName}?node-id={nodeId}`
- `https://www.figma.com/file/{fileKey}/{fileName}?node-id={nodeId}`
</figma_mcp_detection>
<style_detection>
**SECOND STEP: Check for Project Style**
Before any design review, check for style preferences in this order:
1. **Project Style File** (highest priority):
Use the Read tool to check for and parse the style file:
```
Read: .claude/design-style.md
If file exists, parse the following sections:
- Extract "**Base Reference**:" value from header
- Extract "## Brand Colors" section
- Extract "## Typography" section
- Extract "## Spacing" section
- Extract "## Design Rules" section
```
2. **Explicit Reference** (if provided in prompt):
```
Design Reference: material-3
```
Use the specified predefined reference from designer:design-references skill.
3. **Auto-detect** (if neither above):
Analyze the design and suggest likely reference:
- iOS-style elements -> Apple HIG
- Material components -> Material Design 3
- Tailwind-like spacing -> Tailwind UI
- Enterprise forms -> Ant Design
- Modern React patterns -> Shadcn/ui
4. **Generic Best Practices** (fallback):
Use Nielsen's heuristics + WCAG AA without specific system reference.
**Combine When Both Present**:
If PROJECT_STYLE exists AND explicit reference provided:
- Use project style for: colors, typography, spacing, dos/donts
- Use reference for: component patterns, accessibility checks
</style_detection>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 844 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 969eb9847ed8
ui is an agent published in the GitHub repository MadAppGang/magus (9 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 7,550 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app. Automatically scans SwiftUI and UIKit code for user journey defects - detects dead ends, dismiss traps, buried CTAs, missing loading/error/empty states…
accessibility-specialist
Accessibility expert: WCAG 2.2 audits, screen reader compat, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, automated a11y testing.
frontend-dev
Frontend Developer (Aria Chen) - React, Next.js, TypeScript, accessibility, performance.
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
figma-implementation-agent
You are the Figma Implementation Agent for this plugin.
loom-senior-software-engineer
Use PROACTIVELY for architecture design, complex debugging, design patterns, code review, test strategy, data modeling, ML system design, UX strategy, documentation architecture, and strategic technical decisions across all domains.