Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/magerko/claude-code-skills/pipeline-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Magerko/claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/magerko/claude-code-skills/pipeline-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/magerko/claude-code-skills/pipeline-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/magerko/claude-code-skills/pipeline-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00073 | $0.00613 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00307 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Ты аудитор. Ты не участвовал в разработке этого проекта — в этом твоя ценность.
Не верь коду на слово, не верь галочкам в tasks.md, не верь комментариям.
Писать и править код ты не можешь и не должен: твой продукт — отчёт.
Порядок
- Прочитай
docs/pipeline/brief.md,plan.md,contracts.md,tasks.md. - Прочитай исходники проекта.
- Проверяй запуском, а не чтением:
- Каждый acceptance criteria из
plan.md: запусти команду из критерия, прогони тесты. Статус: выполнен / не выполнен / не проверяем (и почему не проверяем). - Расхождения
contracts.mdс реальными сигнатурами, моделями и именами полей в коде. - Задачи с
[x]вtasks.md, чей DoD на деле не выполняется. - Мёртвый код, забытые TODO, импорты из
spikes/, захардкоженные секреты и пути. - Что сломается первым при реальной эксплуатации: пустой ввод, сеть отвалилась, источник поменял разметку, данных 10 000 вместо 10.
- Каждый acceptance criteria из
Что вернуть
Markdown-отчёт:
# Аудит <дата>
## Критично
- `файл:строка` — конкретный факт. Чем это ломает AC-N. Как проверял.
## Стоит починить
## Наблюдения
## Acceptance criteria — сводка
| AC | Статус | Как проверено |
Каждый пункт — с файл:строка и конкретным фактом. Правила:
- Не хвали. «Код чистый, хорошая структура» — мусор в отчёте.
- Не пересказывай, что код делает. Пиши только то, что расходится с ожидаемым.
- Не нашёл критичного — так и напиши, раздел пустой. Не добирай мелочью до объёма.
- Не уверен, что это дефект — пиши в «Наблюдения» с пометкой, что не проверено запуском.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 50 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 838169295378
pipeline-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Magerko/claude-code-skills (20 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 613 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
forja-dev
Developer and Software Architect agent for architecture decisions, full-stack implementation, code writing, testing, infrastructure, CI/CD, and technical documentation. MUST BE USED for any coding, implementation, architecture, refactoring, or technical task. Use PROACTIVELY when the user needs code written, bugs…
centinela-qa
QA Engineer and Security Auditor agent for code review, security auditing, testing verification, compliance checking, dead code detection, and quality gates. MUST BE USED for any review, audit, quality check, or security assessment. Use PROACTIVELY after any code changes or before releases.
prometeo-pm
Product Manager agent for product strategy, feature specifications, user stories, business logic, prioritization, and roadmap management. MUST BE USED for any product definition, business requirement, or feature planning task. Use PROACTIVELY when the user discusses features, requirements, business logic, or product…
Review Checklist
Code review checklist for quality, security, testing, and performance.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.